09 Sep 10
Originally posted by adam warlockThanks, I'll give them a read. Probably won't understand much, so expect more questions. 🙂
To start things off let me just say that the comment that incited my first reply on this thread was the most half-baked attempt that I ever saw in trying to popularize entanglement and Bell's inequalities (later comments weren't exactly stellar either, mind you)
When you are in QM the concept of force makes no sense whatsoever and so this talk of act ...[text shortened]... away and I'll do my best, but just count me out of this action-reaction talk from now on.
09 Sep 10
Originally posted by KazetNagorraAnd what that has to do with anything? If you can find someone that works in BEC and is described in the academia as being a quantum physicist you would have made a point.
Yes, that must be why papers concerning BEC are usually found in PRA and not in PRB...
Care to try again?
09 Sep 10
Originally posted by PalynkaThe SEP article is very digestible, but the EPR article is very heavy (even Einstein himself wasn't very happy with the fact that the mathematical formalism buried his more physical argument).
Thanks, I'll give them a read. Probably won't understand much, so expect more questions. 🙂
But if I were you I'd read through anyway just for having bragging rights.
09 Sep 10
Originally posted by adam warlockI fail to understand why you find a name tag so significant.
And what that has to do with anything? If you can find someone that works in BEC and is described in the [b]academia as being a quantum physicist you would have made a point.
Care to try again?[/b]
10 Sep 10
Originally posted by KazetNagorraMay I assume that your furious google searches failed to find an hit in the academia that classified people working in BEC as quantum physicists?
I fail to understand why you find a name tag so significant.
PS: I fail to understand why you had the need to introduce yourself as a (quantum) physicist in this thread only to later display such an incredible lack of real knowledge in the issues you brought into discussion.
PPS: I also fail to understand why I still haven't replied to the OP, by the way... 😕 😕 😕
10 Sep 10
I think the most shocking scientific discovery, is that by Micheal A Cremo, who is the worlds most authoratative paleoanthropologist, who has discovered a systematic cover up of evidence that man has been around for millions of years, and the artifacts that support this have been hidden and discarded by mainstream science, so as to not disturb the current accepted therory of evolution.
The science of paleonthropology is actually against the therory of evolution, but these dishonest scientists and teachers keep the debunct therory of evolution alive, so as to save face with the people, because to say that they had it all wrong from the start would be very embarrassing and humbling.(so they keep lying) by putting forward and presenting false evidence.
Micheal A Cremo with his book Forbidden Archeology, has blown the whole cover up, that the species have come about by the gradual evloution starting with a single cell.
Any person who accepts the therory of evolution, is a person who has accepted blindly, just like religious people who accept blindly the religion they are born into.
vishva
10 Sep 10
Originally posted by adam warlockAre you still upset about that logic thread where you were wrong?
May I assume that your furious google searches failed to find an hit in the academia that classified people working in BE[b]C as quantum physicists?
PS: I fail to understand why you had the need to introduce yourself as a (quantum) physicist in this thread only to later display such an incredible lack of real knowledge in the issues you brought i ...[text shortened]... .
PPS: I also fail to understand why I still haven't replied to the OP, by the way... 😕 😕 😕[/b]
26 Sep 10
1 edit
Originally posted by vishvahetuInformation about Mr Cremo according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Cremo
I think the most shocking scientific discovery, is that by Micheal A Cremo, who is the worlds most authoratative paleoanthropologist, who has discovered a systematic cover up of evidence that man has been around for millions of years, and the artifacts that support this have been hidden and discarded by mainstream science, so as to not disturb the current accepted therory of evolution.
(quote)
Michael A. Cremo (born July 15, 1948, Schenectady, New York), also known as Drutakarma Dasa, is an American Hindu creationist whose work argues that modern humans have lived on the earth for billions of years. Cremo's antievolutionist book Forbidden Archeology has attracted attention from Hindu creationists and paranormalists, but has been labeled as pseudoscience by representatives of the mainstream archaelogical and paleoanthropologist community. Cremo has referred to himself as a "Vedic creationist."
(unquote)
30 Sep 10
Originally posted by twhiteheadA pompous idiot, mind you.
Come on now. A quantum physicist can hardly be described as an idiot.
A quantum physicist wouldn't talk about forces when talking about QM.
A quantum physicist wouldn't use such a sloppy and poor language while talking about the EPR paradox.
30 Sep 10
Originally posted by vishvahetu“...and presenting false evidence. ...”
I think the most shocking scientific discovery, is that by Micheal A Cremo, who is the worlds most authoratative paleoanthropologist, who has discovered a systematic cover up of evidence that man has been around for millions of years, and the artifacts that support this have been hidden and discarded by mainstream science, so as to not disturb the current ...[text shortened]... lindly, just like religious people who accept blindly the religion they are born into.
vishva
So all the pieces of that vast mountain of evidence for evolution is false?
Can you give a specific example of just one small piece of that evidence that you claim to be false and tell us why you think it is false?