02 Nov 08
Originally posted by KellyJayI doubt you have elementary knowledge on what logic is. Logic is used to represent information in a different way, you can't actually add any information, and since man cannot acquire infinite amount of information you cannot logically prove any empirical fact. Nothing at all. This is not what science tries to do, either. Rather, science tries to describe nature and produces laws and theories which can be empirically verified, not logically proven.
Looks like science doesn't either if the need to turn off logic arise to
make things fit.
Kelly
02 Nov 08
Originally posted by KellyJayWhat is your explanation of background radiation, KJ? Is there another explanation that I am not aware of?
🙂 You honestly believe the Big Bang is the most sound reason there
is for background radiation?
Kelly
I think the observation of background radiation, with its precise predicted properties, was the death of the at the time rival theory, the SteadyState theory. No other theory can explain the background radiation of its 2.7 Kelvin, and homogenous distribution, better than the BigBang theory.
Do you belive in BigBang theory, KJ, or do you have a better explanation of the origin of our universe?
02 Nov 08
Originally posted by FabianFnasActually it's not fully homogeneous, rather it has a small fluctuation superposed on the background radiation, which is precisely as expected as well.
What is your explanation of background radiation, KJ? Is there another explanation that I am not aware of?
I think the observation of background radiation, with its precise predicted properties, was the death of the at the time rival theory, the SteadyState theory. No other theory can explain the background radiation of its 2.7 Kelvin, and homogenous d ...[text shortened]... belive in BigBang theory, KJ, or do you have a better explanation of the origin of our universe?
02 Nov 08
Originally posted by FabianFnasIf you only have one explanation for it, I'd say you have not thought
What is your explanation of background radiation, KJ? Is there another explanation that I am not aware of?
I think the observation of background radiation, with its precise predicted properties, was the death of the at the time rival theory, the SteadyState theory. No other theory can explain the background radiation of its 2.7 Kelvin, and homogenous d ...[text shortened]... belive in BigBang theory, KJ, or do you have a better explanation of the origin of our universe?
much about it now have you? This deserves its own thread. I do not
believe in the Big Bang and I'm discussing the reasons why in several
different threads.
Kelly
02 Nov 08
Originally posted by KellyJayBelieve me, I have choosen between several theories. There is no meaning to wobble between theories. Learning the facts and do your jucgement, that's my motto. And the BigBang theory is winning by far over the next probable theory, the SteadyState.
If you only have one explanation for it, I'd say you have not thought
much about it now have you? This deserves its own thread. I do not
believe in the Big Bang and I'm discussing the reasons why in several
different threads.
Kelly
What is your alternative of the BigBang theroy? You dont believe in BB, so what do you believe in? I will ask this question over and over again until I get an answer - or I will think that you don't know anything, and that you are discussing in the thin air. If not BB then what?
02 Nov 08
Originally posted by FabianFnasI believe in creation not the BB, you want to keep asking that, it is
Believe me, I have choosen between several theories. There is no meaning to wobble between theories. Learning the facts and do your jucgement, that's my motto. And the BigBang theory is winning by far over the next probable theory, the SteadyState.
What is your alternative of the BigBang theroy? You dont believe in BB, so what do you believe in? I will ...[text shortened]... hat you don't know anything, and that you are discussing in the thin air. If not BB then what?
completely up to you.
Kelly
02 Nov 08
1 edit
Originally posted by KellyJayBut creation is not a scientific theory, is it? BigBang is.
I believe in creation not the BB, you want to keep asking that, it is
completely up to you.
Kelly
Further, creation is not a unified theory, it is a very diverse one. So in my opinion you don't have any well defined opinion at all...?
I think you should think outside your box, learn about things, and revise your knowledge about the start of our universe.