Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveHow does a min move limit prevent 1 person alerting using multiple accounts? This is what I was getting at.
There could be a minimum move limit or something to prevent indiscriminate alerting but why should I or other non-subs bother to help when it's made difficult for us to do so.
If the fact is that our help is not wanted , then ok.
D
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveSorry Doc, this option can be abused. Your help is always welcome, and you know where to find the mods. If a user had several user names they can cause a lot more trouble than is worth.
Well, the way I look at it is that notifying of offensive [etc] posts is a help to the site. There could be a minimum move limit or something to prevent indiscriminate alerting but why should I or other non-subs bother to help when it's made difficult for us to do so.
If the fact is that our help is not wanted , then ok.
P-
Originally posted by RagnorakIf a non sub is not able to use an alert link until they had made a few thousand moves for example. That would prevent them just getting multiple accounts to immediately abuse the alert system.
How does a min move limit prevent 1 person alerting using multiple accounts? This is what I was getting at.
D
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemit would take you some time to reach it, right enough.
Many players who've been here several years don't have 20,000 moves. That number's way too high.
Better to go by account duration, e.g., non-subs who've been here for 6 months or more can alert posts.
A time duration could be abused by leaving an account dormant until its ready (internet trolls are devious creatures).
I admit 20,000 might be too much, but gameplay should be rewarded over time.
I agree with DR S, but at the end of the day Its russ's call.
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveMy point was and still is, that there are a number of non-subs who use multiple accounts to bypass the 6 game rule. It is entirely feasible that these accounts have been active for years and thousands of moves.
If a non sub is not able to use an alert link until they had made a few thousand moves for example. That would prevent them just getting multiple accounts to immediately abuse the alert system.
N (the number of alerts needed before a post is removed) is a very small number. 1 user with 3 accounts could obliterate the forums.
D
Originally posted by RagnorakThere would be ways to bypass the rules of course but it would need forward planning and would therefore be less likely.
My point was and still is, that there are a number of non-subs who use multiple accounts to bypass the 6 game rule. It is entirely feasible that these accounts have been active for years and thousands of moves.
N (the number of alerts needed before a post is removed) is a very small number. 1 user with 3 accounts could obliterate the forums.
D
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundThere is no good preventative defense against a troll who is vindictive enough to wait 6 months just to bring down the forums. Whether it's programming a bot to have multiple accounts make thousands of moves against each other, or even paying 100 bucks for three accounts, they can get around the limits, if they really want to.
it would take you some time to reach it, right enough.
A time duration could be abused by leaving an account dormant until its ready (internet trolls are devious creatures).
I admit 20,000 might be too much, but gameplay should be rewarded over time.
I agree with DR S, but at the end of the day Its russ's call.
Originally posted by RagnorakIn other words, a bored rich kid with 90 bucks could obliterate the forums. If this is really a concern, we'd have to do away with the alert system altogether.
My point was and still is, that there are a number of non-subs who use multiple accounts to bypass the 6 game rule. It is entirely feasible that these accounts have been active for years and thousands of moves.
N (the number of alerts needed before a post is removed) is a very small number. 1 user with 3 accounts could obliterate the forums.
D
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemI'm sure Russ would just love to have that rich kid attack the forums for a day, and then be banned, and then resubscribe 3 times, attack the forums and be banned, etc. People would get bored a lot more slowly if they weren't getting hit in the pocket, rich kid or not.
In other words, a bored rich kid with 90 bucks could obliterate the forums. If this is really a concern, we'd have to do away with the alert system altogether.
Anyway, I've made the points I wanted to make.
D
Originally posted by RagnorakFrom what I have read, when someone is banned they get their subscription refunded.
I'm sure Russ would just love to have that rich kid attack the forums for a day, and then be banned, and then resubscribe 3 times, attack the forums and be banned, etc. People would get bored a lot more slowly if they weren't getting hit in the pocket, rich kid or not.
Anyway, I've made the points I wanted to make.
D
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveI don't think that is right. From what I've read, Ironman resubscribed when he got banned (because he didn't know he had been banned). His resubscription got refunded to him. I'd be surprised if Russ refunds all banned people's subs, but I'm not sure. If you got kicked out of a nightclub for fighting, would you expect to get your cover charge back?
From what I have read, when someone is banned they get their subscription refunded.
D