Originally posted by WulebgrYes!! My opponents' games are there, tantalizing me. But, I don't have any easy way to find a particular position among his games. :-(
PGN Others. The ability to research an opponent's prior games is an important element of correspondence chess. Sites that facilitate downloading games of other players make this possible. On RHP, I spent an entire evening gathering the games of one opponent in which he had faced the French Defense. It was a laborious process. At other sites, I've been ab ...[text shortened]... egory because it is much easier to keep up on one's own games one at a time.
RHP score: ?[/b]
To me, email chess is (beyond the beautiful friendships formed) all about analysis. If RHP could give us an "Opening Explorer" style front end to its enormous game database, that would be ideal. Second best would be the ability to download easily all of an opponent's games into our own database tool.
Many thanks for your thoughtful post, here. :-)
Originally posted by RagnorakYes!! These two improvements to RHP are what I personally most want to see.
Planning: The notepad is basic. I'm going to create a seperate thread specifically for a site idea regarding the new analyse board, but I think it would be a giant leap forward if the pgn for a continuation you are exploring in analyse board could be copied direcly into your notepad. I'm just after discovering a lovely line (may not happen) in one of my g ...[text shortened]... ch through the RHP database, ala chesslive, with search parameters like player/rating/colour.
Many thanks! :-)
I notice that many other cc sites are more easy-going with games for non-subscribers.
Just something I have noticed - I ain't pushing for change here or anything but would that not be classed as an advantage for them over this site?
Ps; Even gameknot doesn't give a vacation disadvantage to free members.
[apparently they get a bit longer, that's all]So there's another slip in the ratings surely?
That's if you are doing an unbiased comparison.
Originally posted by Dr Strangelove[apparently they get a bit longer]
Ps; Even gameknot doesn't give a vacation disadvantage to free members.
[apparently they get a bit longer, that's another slip in the ratings surely?
That's if you are doing an unbiased comparison.
subscribing members, that is.
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveWrite your own reviews if you wish, don't tell other people they are biased because their review doesn't match what you would have written.
I notice that many other cc sites are more easy-going with games for non-subscribers.
Just something I have noticed - I ain't pushing for change here or anything but would that not be classed as an advantage for them over this site?
Ps; Even gameknot doesn't give a vacation disadvantage to free members.
[apparently they get a bit longer, tha ...[text shortened]... 's another slip in the ratings surely?
That's if you are doing an unbiased comparison.