Site Ideas
09 Mar 17
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou did gain 58 rating points against Anti-Metallica around Jan 1st 2016.
Will someone please inform this dullard why this is no longer not only possible its no longer effective. I refuse to battle against ignorance any longer.
Did someone say disincentive ???? 😲
Originally posted by roma45Each of your first 3 paragraphs has something you made up in it. But I'm weary of trying to explain these things to you. Work it out on your own.
or we could be more like you admire cheats like the collusion ckans while calling 2200 players engine using cheats
engine users dont worry me i am not good enough to play them alot, guess what neither are you
a lot of players on here enjoy the clan games, which has been ruined by a few using collusion even Russ said so, until that has been fixed i will ...[text shortened]... gain in august unless things change.
now perhaps you can finally answer, what have i made up?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThese threads are like competitions for that title. Each of them brings something to the dance. Radio active users the most dramatic language: "raping" clans for points, and brining in lawyers to sue for hundreds of bucks of subscription money are but two of the many examples. But he's not as prolific as some.
and I thought Cary Stover was the ultimate whingebag! sooo wrong.
Hard contest to judge, that one.
- Joined
- 11 Nov 14
- Moves
- 34223
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemHi big dog
These threads are like competitions for that title. Each of them brings something to the dance. Radio active users the most dramatic language: "raping" clans for points, and brining in lawyers to sue for hundreds of bucks of subscription money are but two of the many examples. But he's not as prolific as some.
Hard contest to judge, that one.
Think you'd need to look v hard to find a bigger t&sser than radio
Did he really say 'raping'? Crikey..
Can't think of any poster who would use worse or more inappropriate language. As you say, several candidates!
Thanks for raising it
Originally posted by mghrn55My point exactly, if two equally rated clans play each other but one clan puts up their best players against the other clans worst players through prearranged collusion as in 2016, clan ranking becomes a farce once again. The only way to prevent collusion, is to limit the number of challenges between clans to 2 or 3 times any given year.
You did gain 58 rating points against Anti-Metallica around Jan 1st 2016.
Did someone say disincentive ???? 😲
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemI just realized that BigDoggPoopblem and RobieCrapolie are the same person.
So, in the deluded mind of some here, threatening not to renew is not the same as threatening to leave.
If they really believe this, they are suggesting that short circuit, the once-proud leader of clan Metallica, would abandon this role (since non subs cannot issue or accept clan challenges) and content himself with being another random, non-sub, ...[text shortened]... hreatening to leave over and over for a year and never doing it. 😛
(have it your own way...)
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemso i made up you dont play 2200 players because you think they are engine cheats? er its written in your profile, you are not the brightest are you.
Each of your first 3 paragraphs has something you made up in it. But I'm weary of trying to explain these things to you. Work it out on your own.
you are not good enough to play 2200 players no need to worry about that.
i can easily work things out on my own got you well sussed you know what i mean
now work that out for yourself.
Originally posted by mghrn55then how are you going to explain only getting 9 points for a similar challenge against the Arrow on the 3rd of March 2017? Did you seriously think that you could cherry pick your data and attempt to make some kind of point on the fact that when the system started it was rather obvious that there would be a greater disparity until ratings levelled out? My goodness do you have an honest bone in your body?
You did gain 58 rating points against Anti-Metallica around Jan 1st 2016.
Did someone say disincentive ???? 😲
One would have thought that you would have observed certain players that when they begin to play they have somewhat rather irregular swings in their rating until it levels out. It looks like you are busted gain Mahgoobs this time for cherry picking. what kind of fools do you take us for?
Originally posted by robbie carrobie9 points or 1 point from the arrow is from cheating collusion so should not count
then how are you going to explain only getting 9 points for a similar challenge against the Arrow on the 3rd of March 2017? Did you seriously think that you could cherry pick your data and attempt to make some kind of point on the fact that when the system started it was rather obvious that there would be a greater disparity until ratings levelled out? My goodness do you have an honest bone in your body?
wow you have a new puppy, scrapping the barrel now not the brightest is he. but hes got your back kissing your butt thats what counts
Originally posted by my2sonsYou still have no idea what you are talking about. It has already been demonstrated to you, with reference that there are little to no incentives for colluding. I have explained it, Russ has explained it, moonbus has explained it and its self evident to anyone who has taken the time to examine any of the challenges and the data. If you don't understand why ask someone for help. You are talking about issues that you have NO UNDERSTANDING of and this is the reason that all you seem capable of proffering is silly punitive actions.
My point exactly, if two equally rated clans play each other but one clan puts up their best players against the other clans worst players through prearranged collusion as in 2016, clan ranking becomes a farce once again. The only way to prevent collusion, is to limit the number of challenges between clans to 2 or 3 times any given year.
Originally posted by roma45I am just going to ignore that, its meaningless drivel.
9 points or 1 point from the arrow is from cheating collusion so should not count
wow you have a new puppy, scrapping the barrel now not the brightest is he. but hes got your back kissing your butt thats what counts