28 May 19
@eladar saidObliged.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Ok if you want to continue baiting, continue doing so.
You post just to post hoping for fights. I am done with you for now. Post again, you are free to get the last word.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidNot to provoke anyone, but I would also like to get in a word before Rusty does.
Obliged.
@caesar-salad saidGo right ahead, I can read sarcasm. I am getting to like eladar. 😉
Not to provoke anyone, but I would also like to get in a word before Rusty does.
He loves going his own way!!!
-VR
28 May 19
@very-rusty saidOh, so blame a guy for putting his antimacassar on backwards.
Go right ahead, I can read sarcasm. I am getting to like eladar. 😉
He loves going his own way!!!
-VR
These vile accusations must stop!
😉
@caesar-salad saidLOL....@ CS....You're not losing it are you? 😉
Oh, so blame a guy for putting his antimacassar on backwards.
These vile accusations must stop!
😉
-VR
@eladar saidYes, it is. It's just that the answer is "no", and they do not feel obligated to inform you of that fact.
Yea, tgat is what moderators are for. I am suggesting that moderators actually act upon requests, making contact with an explanation why a request is not acted upon at the very least.
Instead, request for moderating are completely ignored. That is not moderating at all.
As a matter of fact, their response to your "request" is not any of your business at all, seeing as it is between them and the people accused. Few sites will inform you of action they have taken. This is the norm across the internet. It seems you are crying here for special attention.
@suzianne saidIt is clear they do not moderate until a big enough stink has been raised or if a buddy of the moderator complains.
Yes, it is. It's just that the answer is "no", and they do not feel obligated to inform you of that fact.
As a matter of fact, their response to your "request" is not any of your business at all, seeing as it is between them and the people accused. Few sites will inform you of action they have taken. This is the norm across the internet. It seems you are crying here for special attention.
29 May 19
@eladar saidAre you able to flag posts as you are not a Paying Subscriber? I don't believe you can. I know you could send feedback, but that can take for ages. That is one of the drawbacks of not being a Paying Subscriber. You can always ask someone else to flag a post for you if you think it should be flagged.
It is clear they do not moderate until a big enough stink has been raised or if a buddy of the moderator complains.
-VR
29 May 19
@very-rusty saidOn a side-note, if @eladar is not a paying subscriber but is using an ad-blocker and therefore depriving Russ and other stakeholders of ad revenue, that would lower my esteem for him considerably.
Are you able to flag posts as you are not a Paying Subscriber? I don't believe you can. I know you could send feedback, but that can take for ages. That is one of the drawbacks of not being a Paying Subscriber. You can always ask someone else to flag a post for you if you think it should be flagged.
-VR
@eladar saidWhat's clear here is that they aren't likely to cave to your demands.
It is clear they do not moderate until a big enough stink has been raised or if a buddy of the moderator complains.
Where I come from, we call what you're doing here pounding sand.
Lots of effort for little effect. This is what crying for attention gets you.
30 May 19
@very-rusty saidI can through site feedback.
Are you able to flag posts as you are not a Paying Subscriber? I don't believe you can. I know you could send feedback, but that can take for ages. That is one of the drawbacks of not being a Paying Subscriber. You can always ask someone else to flag a post for you if you think it should be flagged.
-VR
30 May 19
@suzianne saidEnforcing forum guidelines means caving to demands.
What's clear here is that they aren't likely to cave to your demands.
Where I come from, we call what you're doing here pounding sand.
Lots of effort for little effect. This is what crying for attention gets you.
You have no sense of right and wrong beyond your ideological beliefs.
30 May 19
@divegeester
Always, what is right is right. Either moderate or don't. This enforcing tos agsinst some but not othets is wrong.
@eladar saidWhere did you get the idea that this is going on?
@divegeester
Always, what is right is right. Either moderate or don't. This enforcing tos agsinst some but not othets is wrong.
Did you have a post removed where someone else didn't?
-VR