Red Hot Pawn's Hall of Fame

Originally posted by moonbus
Offer a quality service and don't reward trolls.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Red Hot Pawn status quo for the foreseeable future?

Originally posted by moonbus
Any improvement to the quality of the service would be welcome.

Some have suggested better moderating (e.g., more effective, more consistent, and more transparent what the criteria for banishment are).

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Since the suspension of the Clans Forum, verbal fighting would likely be one criteria.
What specific "improvement to the quality of the service" would you like to see?

Originally posted by Bobla45
I think forum contributions should actually mean as much as play. GB, you would be my choice as the first inductee, you have been a tremendous poster, always upbeat, always looking to pull the positive out of others. I think its as important as MAP and quality sportsmanship during games.

Originally posted by Bobla45
...GB, you would be my choice as the first inductee, you have been a tremendous poster, always upbeat, always looking to pull the positive out of others.

Originally posted by divegeester
Would you classify referring to fellow posters as having: "jungle savagery", exhibiting "psychotic jealousy", of wearing "fouled diapers" or their posts being "stinking vomit" or of being "cowards" for thumbing him down...as Grampy Bobby "pulling the best out of other posters"?

Originally posted by Bobla45
I think forum contributions should actually mean as much as play. GB, you would be my choice as the first inductee, you have been a tremendous poster, always upbeat, always looking to pull the positive out of others. I think its as important as MAP and quality sportsmanship during games.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Please identify the actual public forums, thread names and page numbers so that Bobla45
may know the context of these five "quoted " phrases before answering your question. .

Originally posted by divegeester
Do you deny saying those things then?

Here we go again. This is why I say the whole idea of rewarding someone for the forum use is daft

Originally posted by padger
Here we go again. This is why I say the whole idea of rewarding someone for the forum use is daft

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
At the top of the list I'd nominate coquette and drewnogal, Great Big Stees and Ponderable.