Go back
Russ, how about those

Russ, how about those

Site Ideas

c

Russ's Pocket

Joined
04 May 06
Moves
53845
Clock
23 Feb 09

rating floors? Have you taken a look at some of the recently tournaments? In the lower banded tournaments the winners for the most part are 200 over the bands they won. Tournaments seem to be a great way of recovering rating points, but really do little more than treat the real players in the band as cannon fodder.

S
Caninus Interruptus

2014.05.01

Joined
11 Apr 07
Moves
92274
Clock
23 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cheshirecatstevens
rating floors? Have you taken a look at some of the recently tournaments? In the lower banded tournaments the winners for the most part are 200 over the bands they won. Tournaments seem to be a great way of recovering rating points, but really do little more than treat the real players in the band as cannon fodder.
Rec'd - maybe if we bug him enough, he'll get this done.

Very Rusty
Treat Everyone Equal

Halifax, Nova Scotia

Joined
04 Oct 06
Moves
639983
Clock
25 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Rec'd

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
25 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cheshirecatstevens
rating floors?
To deal with rating floors may be a good solution, but I also see some problems. Sandbaggers are always a problem. That's the real problem that should be attended to.

I'm sure that Russ, the creator, is aware of the problem. He will think out something, trust me. Perhaps he will come up with something more geniously than any of us mere mortals has ability to think of.

N
10. O-O

Kalispell, MT

Joined
05 Jul 08
Moves
23554
Clock
25 Feb 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cheshirecatstevens
rating floors? Have you taken a look at some of the recently tournaments? In the lower banded tournaments the winners for the most part are 200 over the bands they won. Tournaments seem to be a great way of recovering rating points, but really do little more than treat the real players in the band as cannon fodder.
I had a pretty good opp to really abuse my rating in a few banded
tournaments (sub-1000) but chose not too as its just bad Karma.
I'm a player who would have been effected by the rating floor, and
I'll agree with these guys, it would have been scandalous to play
at that level in banded tournies.

-GIN

S
Caninus Interruptus

2014.05.01

Joined
11 Apr 07
Moves
92274
Clock
25 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
To deal with rating floors may be a good solution, but I also see some problems. Sandbaggers are always a problem. That's the real problem that should be attended to.

I'm sure that Russ, the creator, is aware of the problem. He will think out something, trust me. Perhaps he will come up with something more geniously than any of us mere mortals has ability to think of.
That's exactly what rating floors are designed to do; stop sandbagging. That's their primary purpose.

pineapple42

Joined
21 Aug 03
Moves
617748
Clock
25 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cheshirecatstevens
rating floors? Have you taken a look at some of the recently tournaments? In the lower banded tournaments the winners for the most part are 200 over the bands they won. Tournaments seem to be a great way of recovering rating points, but really do little more than treat the real players in the band as cannon fodder.
that would be nice, but those goddamned twirling clocks... please please can we have static ones?

a

THORNINYOURSIDE

Joined
04 Sep 04
Moves
245624
Clock
26 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by pineapple42
that would be nice, but those goddamned twirling clocks... please please can we have static ones?
What clocks?

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
26 Feb 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SwissGambit
That's exactly what rating floors are designed to do; stop sandbagging. That's their primary purpose.
There are sandbaggers everywhere, not only in banded tournaments.

I hate when I lose to someone 500 points below me because he lost many games right before he won aginst me, and according to his skill should have 200 points above me. He gets 30 points from me, not very well earned.

I hate sandbaggers wherever I find them. Rating floors don't stop them at all.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
26 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by pineapple42
that would be nice, but those goddamned twirling clocks... please please can we have static ones?
I stop them twirl by hitting Esc button on keyboard.

S
Caninus Interruptus

2014.05.01

Joined
11 Apr 07
Moves
92274
Clock
26 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
There are sandbaggers everywhere, not only in banded tournaments.

I hate when I lose to someone 500 points below me because he lost many games right before he won aginst me, and according to his skill should have 200 points above me. He gets 30 points from me, not very well earned.

I hate sandbaggers wherever I find them. Rating floors don't stop them at all.
It sounds like you do not understand how rating floors actually work, or do not realize that they have not been implemented on this site.

Here's what they'd do to help your situation. Say you start a game against an established 2100+ player. He would have a floor of 1900 [200 points below established class - classes are every hundred points]. No matter how many games he loses, his rating cannot go below 1900. This means he can never drop 500 points below you. If he beats you, he does so as a 1900 player at worst, and thus cannot take 30 points away from you.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
26 Feb 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SwissGambit
It sounds like you do not understand how rating floors actually work, or do not realize that they have not been implemented on this site.

Here's what they'd do to help your situation. Say you start a game against an established 2100+ player. He would have a floor of 1900 [200 points below established class - classes are every hundred points]. No matte ...[text shortened]... beats you, he does so as a 1900 player at worst, and thus cannot take 30 points away from you.
Oh, if it's like you described, then I didn't understand it... Thank you for clarification.

Does this mean that, as an example, I go to jail (Yale?) or something, cannot reach an internet connection for half a year, then I only lose 200 rating points at the most? When I start playing again I start 200 points below my current rating? Correct?

What about my opponents, do they win rating points when I don't lose any?

I have to think this over again, perhaps I wont be so negative anymore, let's see...

S
Caninus Interruptus

2014.05.01

Joined
11 Apr 07
Moves
92274
Clock
26 Feb 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Oh, if it's like you described, then I didn't understand it... Thank you for clarification.

Does this mean that, as an example, I go to jail (Yale?) or something, cannot reach an internet connection for half a year, then I only lose 200 rating points at the most? When I start playing again I start 200 points below my current rating? Correct?

What ab any?

I have to think this over again, perhaps I wont be so negative anymore, let's see...
You can lose 299 points at most. You could be rated 1999 [and you must be established as an over-1900 player, meaning you have been over 1900 for several games in a row]; this is rounded down to the nearest hundred, and 200 points are subtracted for a floor of 1700. If you came back, you'd still be 1700. [This also keeps you out of low-band tourneys, and allows you to enter higher-band tourneys at a more fair rating, which helps everyone].

Yes, opponents who beat you when you're on your floor gain points while you don't lose any.

J

Joined
21 Nov 07
Moves
4689
Clock
27 Feb 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SwissGambit
You can lose 299 points at most. You could be rated 1999 [and you must be established as an over-1900 player, meaning you have been over 1900 for several games in a row]; this is rounded down to the nearest hundred, and 200 points are subtracted for a floor of 1700. If you came back, you'd still be 1700. [This also keeps you out of low-band tourneys, and ...[text shortened]...
Yes, opponents who beat you when you're on your floor gain points while you don't lose any.
That's EXCELLENT! Whoooo! 😀

Edit: No, this is not supposed to be funny. I really think it's an
excellent idea, and I just got a little excited is all. I'm back to my usual self
now, some five seconds later. 🙂

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669977
Clock
27 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

As I have done a few times before I add my supportt to that idea. However I fear it might never come true

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.