@russ saidTake a look at @reservation247 who isn't able to disguise the fact he was the racist/Islamophobic Executioner Brand who was banned earlier this year. And take a look at @savedbygrace who also isn't able to disguise the fact he was Romans1009, VLP1083 and PB1022 [yes, banned three times] and has returned and is fixated in exactly the same way as before.
Any player will have their account removed once confirmed as a returning banned account.
@savedbygrace saidThere's room for both approaches: [1] Russ can delete the accounts of returning banned users, and [2] the mods can, with prompting from feedback and alerts, remove posts that contravene the TOS, as they already do.
Better than a waiting period for new posters would be fair and impartial refereeing of the forums so a relatively small number of posters (two to three, but mainly one) are not allowed to dish out endless amounts of abuse without consequence.
- Joined
- 20 Aug 22
- Moves
- 42
@fmf saidDo you think the mods impartially ban people who frequently post abusive comments?
There's room for both approaches: [1] Russ can delete the accounts of returning banned users, and [2] the mods can, with prompting from feedback and alerts, remove posts that contravene the TOS, as they already do.
@savedbygrace saidI think the mods and Russ do a good job. I think they were right to ban Executioner Brand and they were right to ban PB1022. So you have come to a conclusion about the moderation on this site after supposedly less than 48 hours?
Do you think the mods impartially ban people who frequently post abusive comments?
- Joined
- 20 Aug 22
- Moves
- 42
@fmf saidNot hard to do when the most abusive prick on here, who supposedly has a “great life,” is venting spleen 24/7 in the forums.
I think the mods and Russ do a good job. I think they were right to ban Executioner Brand and they were right to ban PB1022. So you have come to a conclusion about the moderation on this site after supposedly less than 48 hours?
@savedbygrace saidIt is quite clearly you who has been venting his spleen, just as you did when you posted as Romans1009 and PB1022. No matter what screen name you use, and no matter how many times you get banned, you return and exhibit exactly the same fixations every time.
Not hard to do when the most abusive prick on here, who supposedly has a “great life,” is venting spleen 24/7 in the forums.
- Joined
- 20 Aug 22
- Moves
- 42
@fmf saidTell us again about how you were “standing strong” in your atheism when you refused to pray for a dying relative, you narcissistic, navel-gazing prick.
It is quite clearly you who has been venting his spleen, just as you did when you posted as Romans1009 and PB1022. No matter what screen name you use, and no matter how many times you get banned, you return and exhibit exactly the same fixations every time.
22 Aug 22
@savedbygrace saidAh... good old Christians, always turning the other cheek.
Tell us again about how you were “standing strong” in your atheism when you refused to pray for a dying relative, you narcissistic, navel-gazing prick.
- Joined
- 20 Aug 22
- Moves
- 42
22 Aug 22
@shavixmir saidRead Matthew 23. Sometimes it’s not so easy.
Ah... good old Christians, always turning the other cheek.
22 Aug 22
@savedbygrace saidWhen was that?
Tell us again about how you were “standing strong” in your atheism when you refused to pray for a dying relative, you narcissistic, navel-gazing prick.
@russ saidHere's one:
Any player will have their account removed once confirmed as a returning banned account.
@savedbygrace said
Nothing. I just don’t like abusive pricks and I figure there must be a reason Russ allows the most abusive prick on here free rein. Can you think of another reason, aside from divegeester sucking Russ off?
The previously banned Romans1009 and PB1022 down to the ground.
@savedbygrace saidYou are referring to the night my wife nearly died?
Tell us again about how you were “standing strong” in your atheism when you refused to pray for a dying relative, you narcissistic, navel-gazing prick.