Originally posted by RBHILLYes, but its difficult, which explains why the percentage of creationists amongst scientists is significantly lower than in the general population.
Can creationists be real scientists?
Many secular and atheist groups mock Answers in Genesis and the Creation Museum for not being scientific.
And this remains the case regardless of how many influential creationist scientists you can find.
Now if you really want to convince me, show me some articles in peer reviewed science journals that support something that is in the Creation Museum. If the Creation Museum, is scientific, it must be backed up by science. Where is this science? Where are the experimental findings, the science papers, the hypotheses, theories, etc?
And why is it funded by a religion?
Originally posted by FMFIt does go to show you statistically that among scientists, 99.99% accept evolution, whereas in some countries, 40% of the general population believes in creationism. Like the US. So that means that the higher up the educational chain you go, the less likely you are to believe in creationism, so it is a belief for the uneducated.
Your 194 are drawn from 7+ billion?
Originally posted by RBHILLThis does not answer my question which was more aimed at what you do and don't know about scientists.
Wide is the gate that leads to destruction, narrow is the gate that leads to life.
Wide is the majority that leads to destruction, narrow is the minority that leads to life.
