08 Jun 08
1 edit
Especially for Josephw, the most productive religious zealot in our community.
Just answer the questions one for one. You receive 1 point for every "yes"
answer:
1. Have you ever smelled God (and no, a flower is a flower and isn't God)?
2. Have you ever touched God?
3. Have you ever heard God?
4. Have you ever seen God?
5. Have you ever tasted God (excluding oral sex with myself)?
6. Are you using anti-psychotic drugs?
If you score:
0 points:
See. God doesn't exist. No need to worry.
1 to 5 points:
Really now? Are you sure you aren't fibbing? Maybe you should see a shrink, it's basically unhealthy to hear things that nobody else can hear.
6 points:
At least your working on your problems.
08 Jun 08
Originally posted by yo its meDon't worry yim, while shav recognises that I am the most "productive religious zealot" in this community, it is also recognised that he is the most blasphemous. It doesn't bother me.
Why would you write this Shav?
I'll give him this though, he has a sense of humor, and that's hopeful.
Even shav isn't beyond the reach of God!
08 Jun 08
Originally posted by shavixmirPs 34:8 O taste and see that the LORD is good: blessed is the man that trusteth in him.
Especially for Josephw, the most productive religious zealot in our community.
Just answer the questions one for one. You receive 1 point for every "yes"
answer:
1. Have you ever smelled God (and no, a flower is a flower and isn't God)?
2. Have you ever touched God?
3. Have you ever heard God?
4. Have you ever seen God?
5. Have you ever tasted G ...[text shortened]... ar things that nobody else can hear.
6 points:
At least your working on your problems.
Do you think shav, that God is comprehensible to the physical senses?
08 Jun 08
Originally posted by shavixmirNot really. Even as an atheist you cannot logically deny the existence of God simply because you can't see, hear, feel, smell, taste, or touch Him. That would mean you have your head in a box. Closing the door to the possibility of the existence of things beyond your physical senses is the epitome of closed mindedness.
Well, me being an atheist makes that question a little silly now, doesn't it?
Wouldn't it be safer to call yourself an agnostic? 😉
08 Jun 08
Originally posted by shavixmirWho ever said "I have a hunch" god exists, therefor I believe? 🙄
"Why not?" is the obvious answer.
However, what I'm trying to make clear is that if someone has any reason other than a "hunch" that God exists, then he or she is clearly as mad as a hatter on LSD and in serious need of help.
08 Jun 08
Originally posted by josephwDo you allow for there not being a god?
Closing the door to the possibility of the existence of things beyond your physical senses is the epitome of closed mindedness.
Wouldn't it be safer to call yourself an agnostic? 😉
Nothing you have said on this forum has made me suggest that you do. That would make you equally as closed minded.
Also, I can't speak for someone else, but allowing for the possibility of there being a god doesn't make you an agnostic.
I am an atheist and I believe there is no god, but I don't think there is a 0% possibility of god existing - I just don't believe in that which I have no evidence for.
08 Jun 08
Originally posted by josephwDo you think that Shavixmir is capable of love?
Not really. Even as an atheist you cannot logically deny the existence of God simply because you can't see, hear, feel, smell, taste, or touch Him. That would mean you have your head in a box. Closing the door to the possibility of the existence of things beyond your physical senses is the epitome of closed mindedness.
Wouldn't it be safer to call yourself an agnostic? 😉