26 Mar 15
Originally posted by RJHindsLike I have always said, you are a one trick pony. Not interested enough in science to even look at science sites but only that biased so called science that tries (unsuccessfully) to refute the idea Earth is 4 odd billion years old and such.
No. I am low.
HalleluYah !!! Praise the LORD! Holy! Holy! Holy!
I look at journals dealing with astronomy, geology, math, genetics, physics, chemistry, mechanics and such.
You just want to deal the death blow to two sciences, the study of how life began on Earth and how old is Earth.
If that is not true, tell me what journals in what sciences you have read recently.
Originally posted by sonhouseI know by common sense that the Earth is not 4 billion years old for there is no scientific journal that proves the age of the Earth. That figure is all based on conjecture and the ability of scientists to ASSUME. And you know what ASSUME does. 😏
Like I have always said, you are a one trick pony. Not interested enough in science to even look at science sites but only that biased so called science that tries (unsuccessfully) to refute the idea Earth is 4 odd billion years old and such.
I look at journals dealing with astronomy, geology, math, genetics, physics, chemistry, mechanics and such.
Y ...[text shortened]... s Earth.
If that is not true, tell me what journals in what sciences you have read recently.
Originally posted by RJHindsWould you say that there are good and bad assumptions; that not all assumptions are of equal caliber?
I know by common sense that the Earth is not 4 billion years old for there is no scientific journal that proves the age of the Earth. That figure is all based on conjecture and the ability of scientists to ASSUME. And you know what ASSUME does. 😏
Originally posted by RJHindsLike I said, a one trick pony. You pay lip service saying you love science but you really could care less. You only want your computer to work and your TV and your beer to taste good. Other than that, you have no interest in science, only in your vain attempt of trying to tear down those sciences that refute your fairy tale bible stories. That is ALL you are interested in.
I know by common sense that the Earth is not 4 billion years old for there is no scientific journal that proves the age of the Earth. That figure is all based on conjecture and the ability of scientists to ASSUME. And you know what ASSUME does. 😏
Originally posted by sonhouseScience should be about discovering the whole truth. Atheists have attempted to hijack parts of so-called science to support their own interest. The fact that I am not actively working on scientific projects does not mean I hate science or do not appreciate scientific work towards the discoveries of truth. I just believe, as does the former science teacher Kent Hovind, that the theory of evolution is only a false religious belief and not really science. The theory of evolution is also stupid. 😏
Like I said, a one trick pony. You pay lip service saying you love science but you really could care less. You only want your computer to work and your TV and your beer to taste good. Other than that, you have no interest in science, only in your vain attempt of trying to tear down those sciences that refute your fairy tale bible stories. That is ALL you are interested in.
Originally posted by RJHindsLike I said, you have no interest in reading, looking at tv science documentaries, what was the last one you ever watched? You are ONLY interested in tearing down sciences that refutes your bible plagiarized fairy tale.
Science should be about discovering the whole truth. Atheists have attempted to hijack parts of so-called science to support their own interest. The fact that I am not actively working on scientific projects does not mean I hate science or do not appreciate scientific work towards the discoveries of truth. I just believe, as does the former science teacher ...[text shortened]... only a false religious belief and not really science. The theory of evolution is also stupid. 😏