Attrocities of 'Christianity', history of the Churches

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
i have read excerpts from the Darwins book.

As i said -

never bothered to look at the evidence for the said hypothesis.

Evolutionary biology has come along way in the last 150 years.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
As i said -

never bothered to look at the [b]evidence for the said hypothesis.

Evolutionary biology has come along way in the last 150 years.[/b]

Evolutionary biology has come along way in the last 150 years.

so has creationism 😉

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Evolutionary biology has come along way in the last 150 years.

so has creationism 😉

1861: The Comprehensive account of Creationism: Goddidit

2011: The Comprehensive account of Creationism: Goddidit - science is wrong.

Aye...some truly breathtaking strides into the high and harsh mountain range of enlightenment and knowledge ;]

Originally posted by Agerg
[b]1861: The Comprehensive account of Creationism: Goddidit

2011: The Comprehensive account of Creationism: Goddidit - science is wrong.

Aye...some truly breathtaking strides into the high and harsh mountain range of enlightenment and knowledge ;][/b]

How shallow can you be?

Creationism doesn't change. "In the beginning God created..."

But science cannot even answer the question about how life began. It never will. Void.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
As i said -

never bothered to look at the [b]evidence for the said hypothesis.

Evolutionary biology has come along way in the last 150 years.[/b]

It is a very refined belief system.
Kelly

Originally posted by Agerg
[b]1861: The Comprehensive account of Creationism: Goddidit

2011: The Comprehensive account of Creationism: Goddidit - science is wrong.

Aye...some truly breathtaking strides into the high and harsh mountain range of enlightenment and knowledge ;][/b]

as has been explained to you ultra materialists, creationism is simply the interpretation
of THE SAME scientific data, making your statement, well, dare i say, inaccurate, which
for a mathematician, must be a gross sin. repeat 10 lord of the ring verses while
facing north as penance!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
as has been explained to you ultra materialists, creationism is simply the interpretation
of THE SAME scientific data, making your statement, well, dare i say, inaccurate, which
for a mathematician, must be a gross sin. repeat 10 lord of the ring verses while
facing north as penance!

Don't be daft.

In your case it's a dismissal of a hypothesis without even looking at the evidence for it.

Originally posted by KellyJay
It is a very refined belief system.
Kelly

Says the man who thinks humans lived alongside T-Rex's in a big boat.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Don't be daft.

In your case it's a dismissal of a hypothesis without even looking at the evidence for it.

No its not, creationism relies upon the very same data, for example, the fossil record is
cited as not demonstrating a gradual transformation, from one species to another as
Darwin predicted, this is the very same fossil record that the evolutionist have
attempted to utilise to establish their own theory (albeit it with modifications, like
punctuated equilibrium). Its the same data, when will you Noobsters learn this?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Says the man who thinks humans lived alongside T-Rex's in a big boat.

its not any less strange that thinking that a feather could have developed from some
excess skin or scale. Although as you know i do not ascribe to the idea myself
(T-rex's on the ark that is)

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No its not, creationism relies upon the very same data, for example, the fossil record is
cited as not demonstrating a gradual transformation, from one species to another as
Darwin predicted, this is the very same fossil record that the evolutionist have
attempted to utilise to establish their own theory (albeit it with modifications, like
punctuated equilibrium). Its the same data, when will you Noobsters learn this?

Explain to me how the fossil record is evidence for creationism.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I have asked questions there before on some subjects, for example i asked why we
age, why under the perfect conditions can cellular regeneration not perpetuate itself, it
was interesting. I asked about general relativity as i watched a documentary on it and
was intrigued, but I do not hold that Darwinian evolution is scientific (controversial I
know), so this is the place to discuss it.

'There are none so blind as those that will not see'.Its a shame though - maybe one the guys there could have answered your owls wing questions.Or is that the reason you do not want to ask there?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
its not any less strange that thinking that a feather could have developed from some
excess skin or scale. Although as you know i do not ascribe to the idea myself
(T-rex's on the ark that is)

You know this because of your voluminous research you've carried out on the topic right?!

Originally posted by biffo konker
'There are none so blind as those that will not see'.Its a shame though - maybe one the guys there could have answered your owls wing questions.Or is that the reason you do not want to ask there?

Rob has no interest in learning anything on this topic.

I offered to send him one of my books on evolution with the postage to send it back to me. He declined.

He doesn't want to even entertain the possibility of his faith being diminished.

Originally posted by biffo konker
'There are none so blind as those that will not see'.Its a shame though - maybe one the guys there could have answered your owls wing questions.Or is that the reason you do not want to ask there?

first of all, it was the stealth capabilities of the owls feathers, lets get that accurate,
then i gave a concession of any feather. Secondly i asked two of the greatest
protagonists of the theory, the ultra materialist Hamilton and my friend Noobster, both
could not give a simple explanation, therefore if they being protagonists of the theory
cannot give a simple explanation i see no need to ask elsewhere and it remains
unanswered. You can cry about it all you like, it makes no difference.