@divegeester saidHonestly,I have problems to understand what you are trying to say here.
😁
- I am challenging the hard atheists who, rightly in their opinion, deny the possibility of god or gods, and who deny the supernatural generally, but whom simultaneously hold to a form of spirituality by possessively (sic) attempting to conflate the term “spiritual” to underpin non metaphysical attributes of what are essentially cognitive and hormonal phenomena.
Wordy, but I trust I’m making myself clearer.
I think you're trying to say:
Hard atheists deny the existence of god/gods/the supernatual.
But also not really because they do say they can be spiritual nevertheless.
But they are wrong because they don't understand what spirituality is.
Correct?
@vals-loeder saidI believe you.
Honestly,I have problems to understand what you are trying to say here.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI’ve put it in my profile so you can read it yourself.
Please provide an example of a lie I have told in this or any other forum.
If you would like me to drag your dishonesty into the public domain so we can examine your behaviour, then please let me know.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYour first post in this thread, this one I’m replying was honest, forthright and I can concur with your reasoning.
1. Spirituality - Relating to the divine/hereafter
2. Supernatural - Relating to ghosts/paranormal activity
I fully reject both.
Ghost of a Duke said: “Spirituality - Relating to the divine/hereafter“
@divegeester saidWasn't me.
How many of my posts are you going to alert? It’s like watching a child throw its toys around when it can’t get its own way.
To evidence this I have given it a second alert.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidHave you been waiting for me to post something before posting this?
Wasn't me.
To evidence this I have given it a second alert.
@divegeester saidNo.
Have you been waiting for me to post something before posting this?