Bad to worse.......

Originally posted by Proper Knob
That technique hasn't really works out for you so far has it?

I still think its better than a sign with 'the End is Nigh' on it 😀 but each to their own.

Originally posted by galveston75
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_and_anthropogenic_disasters_by_death_toll


Ruffly from this info in Wiki, it's about 150,000,000+ killed in the "major" wars since 1914. 100 years and this many at the minimum have been killed. Probably in the time it takes to read this, a few hundred others will be dead from fighting on the planet.
Find a ...[text shortened]... to this?

http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/massacre.html

http://necrometrics.com/20c5m.htm

wow its certainly is not getting better and better for all of those people.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I still think its better than a sign with 'the End is Nigh' on it 😀 but each to their own.

Give it a try, how else will you know? You are after all a 'man of science', or so you have claimed numerous times, here's your chance to put it to the test.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
did he, mind ray not working at present, will get a mad scientist to travel far into the hills to fix it. 😀

Originally posted by twhitehead
So, show us some statistics. As far as I am aware, the rates of murder, rape, starvation and wars are all going down quite significantly. What do you know that I don't?

Originally posted by galveston75
Sorry but not going there for about the tenth time. This has been discussed over and over so no need to rehash it.

Page 1.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Give it a try, how else will you know? You are after all a 'man of science', or so you have claimed numerous times, here's your chance to put it to the test.

Its quite interesting, i did conduct an experiment between asking people view point questions and simply asking them if they would like a Bible study and my findings were exactly the same. You could get more conversations with the first method but sometimes its better just to cut to the chase as they say 😀

Originally posted by FMF
Originally posted by twhitehead
[b]So, show us some statistics. As far as I am aware, the rates of murder, rape, starvation and wars are all going down quite significantly. What do you know that I don't?

Originally posted by galveston75
Sorry but not going there for about the tenth time. This has been discussed over and over so no need to rehash it.

Page 1.[/b]

yawn another discussion about the discussion, no fun.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yawn another discussion about the discussion, no fun.

Mine was a post about the topic in hand. Mine was a post about evidence.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Why don't you research the raw numbers and see for yourself?

Then you can ask yourself if you really think the smaller number is worse.

i know the numbers, the smaller number is worse. it tells us that violence was ubiquitous during that time. i took the numbers from just the mongol conquests alone!!! add all the other wars happing around the globe at that time and the number goes way above 11%. it maybe tragic that so many died during the 2nd world war, but people on average were much safer during the 1940's than they were during the 1200's.

Originally posted by FMF
Mine was a post about the topic in hand. Mine was a post about evidence.

Yours was a post discussing the discussion. The Gman has posted demographics about war.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its quite interesting, i did conduct an experiment between asking people view point questions and simply asking them if they would like a Bible study and my findings were exactly the same. You could get more conversations with the first method but sometimes its better just to cut to the chase as they say 😀

Now try the sign and let us know how you get on.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Yours was a post discussing the discussion. The Gman has posted demographics about war.

What are the demographics of war in the age of Obama ~ who was name checked by galveston75 in his OP ~ and how do they relate to 1914?

Originally posted by galveston75
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_and_anthropogenic_disasters_by_death_toll


Ruffly from this info in Wiki, it's about 150,000,000+ killed in the "major" wars since 1914. 100 years and this many at the minimum have been killed. Probably in the time it takes to read this, a few hundred others will be dead from fighting on the planet.
Find a ...[text shortened]... to this?

http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/massacre.html

http://necrometrics.com/20c5m.htm

i already have. human deaths in war after the 1914 account for less than 2% of the population. much lower than several other periods of time. the highest being 11% during the mongol wars. the chances of being killed in a war are pretty small compared to the rest of the last 2000 years.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Yours was a post discussing the discussion.

My post drew attention to the fact that the OP poster was already refusing to post any evidence supporting his OP claim on page 1 of his own thread.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you bring it you lazy bum

The least you could do is square the math.

2520 years - 607 B.C.E. (supposedly the end of the Davidic era) = 1914 A.D.

This pre-supposes that your 607 B.C.E. date is correct, which it is not.

It also pre-supposes that Daniel's interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's dream of "till seven times pass over him" means 7 years or 2520 days, times 100, equaling 2520 years, is correct.

Explain that, please.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
i already have. human deaths in war after the 1914 account for less than 2% of the population. much lower than several other periods of time. the highest being 11% during the mongol wars. the chances of being killed in a war are pretty small compared to the rest of the last 2000 years.

And I already said that percentages are a statistical whitewash.

The sheer actual number difference is staggering and I do not see why you ignore it. Oh, yeah, you want it to appear that you "won" the argument.