Beware - "red letter" antichrists

Originally posted by @sonship
I have my timer out and am waiting for FMF [...] to demand that I list the specific names of particpants here who know God and the ones who know about God.

What "timer"? What "list"?

Originally posted by @sonship
You mean you never had enough to say to write a dedicated thread of your own to the subject ?

Never had enough to say about what? What is the matter with you?

Originally posted by @fmf
So you are angry about something I didn't say, or didn't "admit", is that it?

No. Seeing a three dimensional man try to live only on two dimensions doesn't as much anger me as involve my sympathy.

Seeing a man created "spirit and soul and body" try to live only on "soul and body" is not a pretty sight. It doesn't provoke anger as much as empathy for when I remember having a dead spiritual component to my being.

Opposing God's salvation might give rise to some holy anger. But I think that is not such a concern to me.

You had several years here.
In which thread you started with your OP could we see the deepest and most fulfilling explanation to the why's of your life here on earth?

It would have made the difference of __________ once you melt back into the dust ?

I need to see your whole thread. I need to see and sense your deep satisfaction in your philosophy.

Originally posted by @sonship
In which thread you started with your OP could we see the deepest and most fulfilling explanation to the why's of your life here on earth?

You're still asking me this?

Another place we could beware of "red letter" antichrist teaching is in the denial that Jesus Christ is said the sin was not believing in Him - Himself.

It is in the "red letters" of while He "walked on earth".

"And when He [the Holy Spirit] comes He will convict the world concerning sin ... Concerning sin, because they do not believe in Me ..." (See John 16:8,9)

The world sins because of not believing in Christ Himself.
This is not just because "You don't do what I command".
This is sin because of unbelief in Christ Himself.

An "antichrist" teaching would conceivably say this is not part of His ministry to teach this.

Originally posted by @sonship
I need to see your whole thread. I need to see and sense your deep satisfaction in your philosophy.

I can remember three occasions in the past when you went to this Go-To deflection/challenge of yours.

The first time I dutifully went off and found about 20 threads - html links and all - that I'd started in the previous year or two that reflected on - or invited discussion about - things that interest me philosophically and spiritually.

I posted them. You muttered something about having no time to read my threads. And that was it. You simply ignored my rise to your challenge.

About 8 months later you demanded evidence of threads I'd started that reflected my perspectives. I once again found about 10 or 12 of the most recent ones. I posted them.

This time you simply blanked it out without a word.

Late last year you tried the same thing. I couldn't be bothered. I realize that your Go-To deflection/challenge is just you venting.

And here you are again.

Originally posted by @sonship
So though over several years plenty of times I encountered the "disagreeable, argumentative, annoying (in spades) and stubborn," I sure didn't call each and every one of them an Antichrist, Did I?

If you can quite honestly before the Lord tell me now that when you wrote your OP that you in no way had Rajk999 in mind, then I will take you completely at your word.

Can you tell me that sonship?

Originally posted by @divegeester
If you can quite honestly before the Lord tell me now that when you wrote your OP that you in no way had Rajk999 in mind, then I will take you completely at your word.

Can you tell me that sonship?

The OP is really beside the point.
Go back through hundreds of posts of mine for several YEARS.

Lots of contrarians to things I wrote, I did not call "antichrists" or influenced by demons.

Its just a fact that sparingly I have used either of those two remarks. But use them I did, when I thought the problem was serious enough.

I think the first time I used this charge was against RJHinds who I consider is most likely a brother in Christ to me.

I cautioned him, CAUTIONED him in a tone of some rebuke that he was putting forth a teaching of an antichrist nature.

My memory may need refreshing. But I think it was over his strong opposition that the Lord Jesus is the Spirit. He thought that was cultic error. And it is the word of God.

"But the Lord is the Spirit" (2 Cor. 3:17)

"the last Adam became a life giving Spirit" ( 1 Cor.
15:45)

I think that was our argument. Note, RJHinds and I debated mightily about Young Earth vs Old Earth, Gap theory verses billions of years of evolution.

For those disagreements I never said that his interpretation was an antichrist teaching or that what he taught was a doctrine of demons.

Every strong disagreement between me and others here has not led to me leveling such charges, BY FAR.

Originally posted by @sonship
The OP is really beside the point.
Go back through hundreds of posts of mine for several YEARS.

Lots of contrarians to things I wrote, I did not call "antichrists" or influenced by demons.

Its just a fact that sparingly I have used either of those two remarks. But use them I did, when I thought the problem was serious enough.

I think the first ti ...[text shortened]... strong disagreement between me and others here has not led to me leveling such charges, BY FAR.

Sounds like a "Yes .. I had Rajk999 in mind, but I dont want to say it clearly"
Dive seems to be interested in hearing you spell it out but Rakj999 does not care two hoots of your opinion.

Originally posted by @sonship
Oh, that means "I give up."

Might be wise sir to end all your replies to me, "Uncle, uncle!"

Would save you a great deal of mental tribulation.

Originally posted by @sonship
Look aside at the minute hand on your nearest clock "God".
Each tick is bringing you minute closer to your last breath and the beat of your heart.

[quote] [b] "...None can by any means redeem his brother or give to God a ransom for him

(For redemption of their soul is costly and must be given up forever) That he would yet live always [i]and[ ...[text shortened]... ote]

God is the uncreated Life - the eternal Father.
And He became a man to be the Redeemer.

Noob !! I am not my body , its just a vessel

Originally posted by @sonship
Look aside at the minute hand on your nearest clock "God".
Each tick is bringing you minute closer to your last breath and the beat of your heart.

[quote] [b] "...None can by any means redeem his brother or give to God a ransom for him

(For redemption of their soul is costly and must be given up forever) That he would yet live always [i]and[ ...[text shortened]... ote]

God is the uncreated Life - the eternal Father.
And He became a man to be the Redeemer.

No time no space just one big universal family. How good is life!!

Originally posted by @fmf
To karoly-aczel: [b]Look aside at the minute hand on your nearest clock "God".
Each tick is bringing you minute closer to your last breath and the beat of your heart.

Hey now, karoly, I think he is alluding to what he thinks his torturer god is going to do to you if you don't join his religion before you die.[/b]

Lol . I am the torturer . The righteous cant b touched

Originally posted by @sonship
If it hasn't been said before there can be something of a vast difference between -

1.) Knowing God.

2.) Just knowing about God.

Snap!! I will say it again : You are God .

Originally posted by @fmf
Well it brought this on:

[b]Isn't it torture enough to live a life of such enmity and anger against God and Jesus Christ ? The darkness and emptiness in the heart! ... the not knowing God's love, God's fellowship, not knowing what your human life is?? I'd think he'd find it torture enough to adopt your mind and heart.

I, in all my years here, have never said anything remotely like this to you.

What I said to karoly was true.[/b]

You know it bro