28 Mar 16
Originally posted by sonhouseyes but the point i am attempting to get you to see is that the ethnic/religious/political strife has its roots in events prior to the Balknas conflict in the nineties which you seem to have been blissfully unaware of.
Did you actually read that piece? Serbs were killed or forced to convert to Catholic faith, not Islam.
So you figure payback is ok, Serbs were killed, as atrocious as that was, and that justified the killing of thousands of Serbian Muslims?
28 Mar 16
Originally posted by sonhouseYes, I admit that it's true, but come on, it was 3500 years ago. Some would say we've learned a bit since then, others say no, not so much.
So you are then part of the problem. Women are on a lower level than men in your society.
There is no other way to say it. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck.......
I'm sure you will follow up with verse after verse extolling the virtues of women, just don't let them be your boss, no matter HOW much more intelligent a given woman is or how much experience they have. They will NEVER be your boss.
28 Mar 16
Originally posted by SuzianneSo now the present disparity in pay by gender, women are down I think 15% over men in the same job and same ability and years of service.
Yes, I admit that it's true, but come on, it was 3500 years ago. Some would say we've learned a bit since then, others say no, not so much.
That is down from 60 % less 3500 years ago. So you gained 45% in 3500 years. 4.5% in 350 years. Can anyone figure out when women will equal men in pay at that rate? It looks like another 3500 years before that happens.
Can you wait that long?🙂
Originally posted by sonhouseIf I was King of the world, I would ban Islam and declare all Muslims to renounce the vile religion called Islam.
You said you are not judging but merely want to understand.
So how is Dasa's stance on Muslims any different from Slobodan Milošević who as you know has just been judged and convicted of war crimes, genocide and such, f the in the deaths of some 8000 Sebian Muslims.
How is Dasa any different from him, when Dasa calls for the death of ALL Muslims?
I ...[text shortened]... now as powerless as he is, don't you believe in the scripture saying in a man's heart so he is?
Those who don't and take up arms would be cut down swiftly.
Those who have no arms and renounce that vile religion are free to go.
People ..............Is that clear enough ? now
I cannot be any clearer than that.
Originally posted by DasaTerrorist rhetoric.
If I was King of the world, I would ban Islam and declare all Muslims to renounce the vile religion called Islam.
Those who don't and take up arms would be cut down swiftly.
Those who have no arms and renounce that vile religion are free to go.
People ..............Is that clear enough ? now
I cannot be any clearer than that.
Originally posted by DasaWhat would you do to those who neither renounced their religion nor took up arms?
If I was King of the world, I would ban Islam and declare all Muslims to renounce the vile religion called Islam. Those who don't and take up arms would be cut down swiftly. Those who have no arms and renounce that vile religion are free to go.
29 Mar 16
Originally posted by sonhouseLuckily, right now I work in a building with hundreds of orher men and women who are required by Federal law to be paid exactly the same for the same position and same time of service.
So now the present disparity in pay by gender, women are down I think 15% over men in the same job and same ability and years of service.
That is down from 60 % less 3500 years ago. So you gained 45% in 3500 years. 4.5% in 350 years. Can anyone figure out when women will equal men in pay at that rate? It looks like another 3500 years before that happens.
Can you wait that long?🙂
But yeah, it's an uphill battle, especially in the private sector.
29 Mar 16
Originally posted by DasaDo you think by renouncing a religion you cease to believe in it?
If I was King of the world, I would ban Islam and declare all Muslims to renounce the vile religion called Islam.
Those who don't and take up arms would be cut down swiftly.
Those who have no arms and renounce that vile religion are free to go.
People ..............Is that clear enough ? now
I cannot be any clearer than that.
Do you think religious beliefs are that fragile?
29 Mar 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobie1. It lets a person know that his views are abhorrent to you.
Can someone explain the purpose of condemning to me, please.
2. It lets other people know that the views in question are abhorrent to you.
Many people change their views based on the prevailing cultural acceptability of the views. Gay marriage for example has become much more acceptable in recent years largely because enough people stood up and condemned those that were against it. The same happened with slavery and to some extent women's rights (still a work in progress).
Your own organization practices a number of forms of social pressure which amount to not just condemning certain practices but also taking further action to deliberately make it very uncomfortable for the person in question whose views you disapprove of. To claim that you are against condemning is blatant hypocrisy.
Originally posted by twhitehead1. What if the recipient of your denunciation does not care two farthings about whether his views are abhorrent to you? Surely your attempt to make him aware is an exercise in futility.
1. It lets a person know that his views are abhorrent to you.
2. It lets other people know that the views in question are abhorrent to you.
Many people change their views based on the prevailing cultural acceptability of the views. Gay marriage for example has become much more acceptable in recent years largely because enough people stood up and conde ...[text shortened]... on whose views you disapprove of. To claim that you are against condemning is blatant hypocrisy.
2. Why should we be concerned about letting other people know that such views are abhorrent, surely it is enough for us to know within ourselves that such a stance is abhorrent, what could we possibly gain from letting other people know. Are you not simply engaging in propagandising?
Your personal remarks are unworthy of serious comment and will be ignored.
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeCapitulating to hatred? What does that mean? Are you attempting to state that if one does not kick every dog that barks at us we are capitulating to the dogs loathing of us? Are you Ghastly one?
If you can explain the purpose of capitulating to hatred.