06 Feb 11
Originally posted by vishvahetuMy conclusion is that you are, indeed, verging on insanity!
Lower forms of life have different levels sentient feelings.
Cows have similar levels of sentient feelings as do humans.
Bugs have very low sentient feelings.
Microbes have no sentient feelings.
I said that bacteria do not suffer and feel pain as higher life forms, but they still have the soul within.
It does not matter if the lower form ha ...[text shortened]... ssify them ignorant, ignoramus and ignoble.
How are you coming to your conclusion about this.
Just read, and re-read, all of your contradictions you just made in one single post, namely this one above.
You are on a unique track. I'd love to see where it goes. Please keep in touch, if possible, on a human mentative level.
-m.
06 Feb 11
Originally posted by vishvahetuThe fact that you do not agree with me does not make me a liar; please try to get a grip on this very basic piece of logic.
This is the sought of falsity that I am talking about.
The false teachings of the Bible, tells the followers that animal slaughter is ok and not to be cruel to animals has no spiritual value whatsoever,
Absolute nonsense and a very dangerous belief.
Anyway, what (and exactly please), is "dangerous" about believing it's acceptable to kill animals and eat them?
I am not interested in a further diatribe of your personal distate of the practice, but at least some level of evidence based discussion to support this rather emotive claim you are making.
06 Feb 11
Originally posted by sonhouseLiquor store where I go busking sometimes.
What's a bottle O? Is that like what we call the 'animal pound' here in the US? A place where animals are put to either be given to a family or to be put to death.
We aussies have a tendence to put "o" on the end of everything, especially names, "Stevo,Davo,Marto,etc."
06 Feb 11
Originally posted by divegeesterPoint noted.
I never used the word "abhor" and you are extrapolating a single comment (and a personal opinion of myself) about smoking to generalise about a global community of Christians, you should not do this. I do not (of course!) represent the majority of Christians and I'm sure my view of Christianity and especially the so called temporal Christian church woul ...[text shortened]... rate and eat a balanced diet and take regular exercise...in short, keep some perspective.
Still, which is worse:5 ciggies a day, or the disconnection between people and the food put in front of them?
06 Feb 11
Originally posted by vishvahetuStill sounds too serious and negative to me.
Try and understand this very important point....
If I am talking with someone and having a discussion about lets say the eternal soul, and the other person interrupts the flow of the conversation by saying something incorrect, I would have to at that point correct the mistake for the sake of the conversation going forward....do you follow?
So in thi ...[text shortened]... aos.
The mistakes are NOT dishonest.....but the refusal to correct the mistake is dishonest.
I dont know mate, keep plodding along, the fact that you show reluctance to change and seem so cock-sure of yourself is worrying.
Fundie talk like that is always worrying
So different to the humourful , yet wise utterances that came from the bhuddas "golden lips"
06 Feb 11
Originally posted by divegeesterWell ,I'm guesing that the former is worse for you but you dont impose that on others.
That's for the individual to decide - I don't judge in that respect.
Individually I decide that the latter is worse, and not just the disconnection between meat but also veges and fruit.
06 Feb 11
Originally posted by mikelomWhat contradictions....there are none.
My conclusion is that you are, indeed, verging on insanity!
Just read, and re-read, all of your contradictions you just made in one single post, namely this one above.
You are on a unique track. I'd love to see where it goes. Please keep in touch, if possible, on a human mentative level.
-m.