Originally posted by dj2beckerLike I said, I exert no power or any restrictions over you and you are free to think and say whatever you want. You are in denial and ignorant about psychological abuse. And that is what we are discussing. You are free to behave as you see fit on this forum. I hold no threats over you.
So if I am free to think that I was not psychologically abused what have you been on about?
Originally posted by FMFAgain you are welcome to assume that since I was in an environment of psychological abuse I also suffered psychological abuse. You are welcome to assume this, even if you can not prove it.
Like I said, I exert no power or any restrictions over you and you are free to think and say whatever you want. You are in denial and ignorant about psychological abuse. And that is what we are discussing. You are free to behave as you see fit on this forum. I hold no threats over you.
Originally posted by dj2beckerWe have your own 220 word testimony and the corroborating testimonies you suggested we read.
Again you are welcome to assume that since I was in an environment of psychological abuse I also suffered psychological abuse. You are welcome to assume this, even if you can not prove it.
Originally posted by FMFOk you are also welcome to use my 220 words and judge them to by your own subjective opinions of what constitutes psychological abuse and reach whatever conclusions you deem fit.
We have your own 220 word testimony and the corroborating testimonies you suggested we read.
Originally posted by dj2beckerI doubt you would find a professional psychiatrist or psychologist who would disagree with my take on it, aside, perhaps, from those on the payroll of your cult who might have been involved in covering up the violence and rapes that went on and acting as apologists in the media.
Ok you are also welcome to use my 220 words and judge them to by your own subjective opinions of what constitutes psychological abuse and reach whatever conclusions you deem fit.
Originally posted by dj2beckerHuh? This is a non sequitur.
Subjecting myself to rules that are not in the Bible for one.
Look at page 50. Your comment was in reply to what I said, which was about the toll being in a cult seems to have taken on you (and still affecting you to this day), not about theology.
Originally posted by FMFAgain you are welcome to your subjective opinions that I was personally abused. And you are also welcome to think that every professional psychiatrist or psychologist will share your opinion.
I doubt you would find a professional psychiatrist or psychologist who would disagree with my take on it, aside, perhaps, from those on the payroll of your cult who might have been involved in covering up the violence and rapes that went on and acting as apologists in the media.
Originally posted by dj2beckerNo, I am referring to the standard understanding of professional psychologists.
If by 'standard understanding' you are referring to your own personal opinion of what the 'standard understanding' is, then we are agreed.
Please explain why deprivation is not a form of abuse?
Originally posted by dj2beckerIf I have opened your eyes to your ignorance (if you made up the story) or your denial (if you didn't make it up) then it will have been worth it.
Again you are welcome to your subjective opinions that I was personally abused. And you are also welcome to think that every professional psychiatrist or psychologist will share your opinion.