04 Feb 19
This thread should be allowed to die.
It will then then be my prediction is that Edward Palamar will be along one or twice a week to bump it with some inane comment for same reason that (for example) sonship would rather his threads had some activity rather than none, even if it is hostile.
It’s driven by a need to see their words and ideas getting forum airtime, any airtime.
@divegeester said"This thread should be allowed to die."
This thread should be allowed to die.
It will then then be my prediction is that Edward Palamar will be along one or twice a week to bump it with some inane comment for same reason that (for example) sonship would rather his threads had some activity rather than none, even if it is hostile.
It’s driven by a need to see their words and ideas getting forum airtime, any airtime.
Did that idea just pop into your head out of the blue? Why don't you just stop posting in it?
"It will then then be my prediction is..."
That makes a lot of sense! 🤦♂️
"...sonship would rather his threads had some activity rather than none, even if it is hostile."
We can count on you for the hostility.
"It’s driven by a need to see their words and ideas getting forum airtime, any airtime."
Is that why you're here posting 24/7?
05 Feb 19
@secondson saidStill got your boner for me I see Josephw 😉
"This thread should be allowed to die."
Did that idea just pop into your head out of the blue? Why don't you just stop posting in it?
"It will then then be my prediction is..."
That makes a lot of sense! 🤦♂️
"...sonship would rather his threads had some activity rather than none, even if it is hostile."
We can count on you for the hostil ...[text shortened]... ir words and ideas getting forum airtime, any airtime."[/b]
Is that why you're here posting 24/7?
05 Feb 19
@divegeester saidTrumpism?
It’s driven by a need to see their words and ideas getting forum airtime, any airtime.
10 Feb 19
@divegeester saidAfter 31 pages, let's see if you've learned anything?
It’s driven by a need to see their words and ideas getting forum airtime, any airtime.
When did the two ages of Mark 10:30 meet?
And be correct, you wouldn't want to waste your airtime now, would you?
10 Feb 19
@edward-palamar saidMark Zuckerberg?
After 31 pages, let's see if you've learned anything?
When did the two ages of Mark 10:30 meet?
And be correct, you wouldn't want to waste your airtime now, would you?
10 Feb 19
@edward-palamar saidAnd if you say in your heart, ‘How may we know the word that the LORD has not spoken?’— when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the LORD has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously. You need not be afraid of him.
After 31 pages, let's see if you've learned anything?
When did the two ages of Mark 10:30 meet?
And be correct, you wouldn't want to waste your airtime now, would you?
Deuteronomy 18: 20-22
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
11 Feb 19
@edward-palamar said30 pages of this thread are people telling you your countdown went absolutely nowhere.
After 31 pages, let's see if you've learned anything?
When did the two ages of Mark 10:30 meet?
And be correct, you wouldn't want to waste your airtime now, would you?
11 Feb 19
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhen a person is as deluded as Edward Palamar the lack of even the slightest shread of evidence supporting the outcome of thier prophecy becomes irrelevant.
30 pages of this thread are people telling you your countdown went absolutely nowhere.
20 Feb 19
@divegeester saidIt has come to pass.
if the word does not come to pass or come true
We have entered the "age to come" (54 days into it, and counting) foretold by Jesus in Mark 10:30.
http://risen-from-the-dead.forumotion.com/
20 Feb 19
@edward-palamar saidWhy wasn't the story on CNN?
It has come to pass.
We have entered the "age to come" (54 days into it, and counting) foretold by Jesus in Mark 10:30.
http://risen-from-the-dead.forumotion.com/
20 Feb 19
@edward-palamar saidYou are talking out of your arse.
It has come to pass.
We have entered the "age to come" (54 days into it, and counting) foretold by Jesus in Mark 10:30.
http://risen-from-the-dead.forumotion.com/
20 Feb 19
@ghost-of-a-duke said"Nowhere" doesn't exist.
30 pages of this thread are people telling you your countdown went absolutely nowhere.
I think it would be more correctly stated that this thread "didn't go anywhere."
Which explains why a certain poster keeps reviving it. 😬
20 Feb 19
@edward-palamar saidNo we haven't entered the "age to come". Paul refers to the "ages to come". I think you confused what Paul meant with what Jesus said in John 10:30.
It has come to pass.
We have entered the "age to come" (54 days into it, and counting) foretold by Jesus in Mark 10:30.
http://risen-from-the-dead.forumotion.com/
You appear to have taken Jesus out of context when He said, "But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life."
The passage from which that verse comes is relative to having eternal life, and not to the entering of the "ages to come", about which Paul was referring to, which you have obviously confused with what Jesus was talking about.
I thoroughly examined a website you had linked, and my advice to you is to sever yourself from the mysticism of the Catholic Church as quickly as you can.