03 Nov 10
Originally posted by FabianFnasI explained earlier that any subjective opinion can be considered accurate or false solely when it is judged in a specific scientific and philosophical context. A fact is merely an event, and an event is anyway real: you cannot claim that an event is accurate or false, you can solely argue that something is either fact or fiction.
Every subjectiv fact is accurate for the individual having fact. If it wasn't accurate for him, then why would he have it?
Not according to me, but according of what I've understood you of your writings. That's your subjectiv fact, not mine.
This subjective fact of yours that there in fact are no objective facts are not accurate for anyone else but you.
Of course, the facts that are solely known to me, they are real solely to me and to nobody else; the facts that are known solely to me and to my wife are real strictly to us and to nobody else, etc etc. These specific subjective facts can be accepted as 100% real by other individuals solely if these individuals decide to beleive blindly that they are real😵
05 Nov 10
Originally posted by black beetlethat kinda makes you and your wife the prophets of your religion, doesn't it?😀
I explained earlier that any subjective opinion can be considered accurate or false solely when it is judged in a specific scientific and philosophical context. A fact is merely an event, and an event is anyway real: you cannot claim that an event is accurate or false, you can solely argue that something is either fact or fiction.
Of course, the fact ...[text shortened]... by other individuals solely if these individuals decide to beleive blindly that they are real😵
05 Nov 10
Originally posted by black beetle"A fact is merely an event, and an event is anyway real: you cannot claim that an event is accurate or false, you can solely argue that something is either fact or fiction."
I explained earlier that any subjective opinion can be considered accurate or false solely when it is judged in a specific scientific and philosophical context. A fact is merely an event, and an event is anyway real: you cannot claim that an event is accurate or false, you can solely argue that something is either fact or fiction.
Of course, the fact ...[text shortened]... by other individuals solely if these individuals decide to beleive blindly that they are real😵
I do not think anyone argues about an event as much as we do what we think
it means. Case in point, you can see a test result, you don't have to agrue
about the results, we do argue what we say the results tell us.
Kelly
05 Nov 10
Originally posted by KellyJayOh well Kelly perhaps you missed a bit, I replied to our Zahlanzi on the basis of our conversation earlier at this thread regarding specific events (that are known solely to a couple and not to everybody else).
"A fact is merely an event, and an event is anyway real: you cannot claim that an event is accurate or false, you can solely argue that something is either fact or fiction."
I do not think anyone argues about an event as much as we do what we think
it means. Case in point, you can see a test result, you don't have to agrue
about the results, we do argue what we say the results tell us.
Kelly
However your point is taken -and over here we agree 😵
06 Nov 10
Originally posted by black beetle🙂
Oh well Kelly perhaps you missed a bit, I replied to our Zahlanzi on the basis of our conversation earlier at this thread regarding specific events (that are known solely to a couple and not to everybody else).
However your point is taken -and over here we agree 😵
Okay, sorry I jumped in without all the info.
Kelly
07 Nov 10
Originally posted by clandarkfireThis was a copy paste
I understand the importance the resurrection story holds in your particular religion. If I too knew some guy that had been killed and placed inside a cave with a rock in front of it and I visited the cave to find the rock moved and his body gone, the only logical assumption would be that he had risen from the dead and is the son of God. Once, my friend ...[text shortened]... iarized the above content. However, can we agree that the author makes a good point?[/i]