Spirituality
01 Oct 13
08 Oct 13
To the Instructor, that is a mighty title, be carefull. I believe in many things, and ussually outside to box. It is written, one day is "LIKE" a 1000 years to God. Suddenly everyone is confused, and state, "Oh that means, one day IS a 1000 years to God." Please, give me a break. Show me the beginning and end of a circle. If you can't, and you won't, because there is no beginning or end, then you will understand, Time has No meaning to God.
08 Oct 13
Originally posted by PudgenikAll of God's creation has meaning, even TIME.
To the Instructor, that is a mighty title, be carefull. I believe in many things, and ussually outside to box. It is written, one day is "LIKE" a 1000 years to God. Suddenly everyone is confused, and state, "Oh that means, one day IS a 1000 years to God." Please, give me a break. Show me the beginning and end of a circle. If you can't, and you won't, because there is no beginning or end, then you will understand, Time has No meaning to God.
The Instructor
08 Oct 13
Originally posted by RJHindsSeriously?
Are dinosaurs mentioned in the Holy Bible?
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/b-dinosaurs-mentioned-in-bible.htm
It looks like the answer is yes to me.
The Instructor
You show me some crack job website and tout it as proof? The Leviathin and Behemoth, dinosaurs?
Wow, just wow.
Originally posted by joe beyserThey did not, however, demonstrate that the 'human' footprints were actually human. In fact, if you choose to examine them yourself, you'll see that they're not actually very much like human footprints at all. Further, they correlate on a one-to-one basis with the dinosaur prints. This correlation and the uniform spacing pretty conclusively demonstrates that they're actually a part of the dinosaur prints themselves.
I think it is as they dug up the river bank exposing more tracks proving it was not a fake.
There were also some pretty obviously carved prints in the limestone at Paluxy. I'm not sure if any of these are still there, I do know that some have been removed.
Originally posted by avalanchethecatThere was at least one of the human footprints that was along side of the dinosaur footprints, so to conclude that the human footprints insde the dinosaur footprint is a part of that particular dinosaur seems ridiculous. There were also human handprints found with dinosaur footprints.
They did not, however, demonstrate that the 'human' footprints were actually human. In fact, if you choose to examine them yourself, you'll see that they're not actually very much like human footprints at all. Further, they correlate on a one-to-one basis with the dinosaur prints. This correlation and the uniform spacing pretty conclusively demonstra ...[text shortened]... at Paluxy. I'm not sure if any of these are still there, I do know that some have been removed.
Human and dinosaur footprints together
http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/footprints.htm
The Instructor
Originally posted by RJHindsNonsense. But then we've long since established that your critical faculties lack even remotely sound foundation, so your obviously errant belief here is no surprise.
There was at least one of the human footprints that was along side of the dinosaur footprints, so to conclude that the human footprints insde the dinosaur footprint is a part of that particular dinosaur seems ridiculous. There were also human handprints found with dinosaur footprints.
Human and dinosaur footprints together
http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/footprints.htm
The Idiot
09 Oct 13
Originally posted by avalanchethecatI will have to revisit this.
They did not, however, demonstrate that the 'human' footprints were actually human. In fact, if you choose to examine them yourself, you'll see that they're not actually very much like human footprints at all. Further, they correlate on a one-to-one basis with the dinosaur prints. This correlation and the uniform spacing pretty conclusively demonstra ...[text shortened]... at Paluxy. I'm not sure if any of these are still there, I do know that some have been removed.
Originally posted by avalanchethecatIt is NOT nonsense. That website shows pictures of the dinosaur footprints, the human footprints and handprint. The distance measured between the dinosaur footprints indicates the stride length of this animal was greater than the strides length of the 11 inch human footprints for sure. The stride length of the 16 inch human footprints was greater than the 11 inch footprint just as would be expected.
Nonsense. But then we've long since established that your critical faculties lack even remotely sound foundation, so your obviously errant belief here is no surprise.
"The stride for the 11 inch person was about 18 inches from heel to heel and 30 inches for the human making the 16 inch long prints in the sketched trail of Figure 8. The stride for intersecting dinosaur (17 inch long from middle toe to heel) in Figure 5 was about 40 inches. Of course strides are not perfect either as someone may be walking slow or running but it gives a comparative idea of stride between the two species."
http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/footprints.htm
The Instructor