Originally posted by lemon limeI'm not interested in semantics. I wanted to clear up the fact
[b]But after weighing me and seeing that I do weigh 200 pounds the
statement "I weigh 200 pounds" is still falsifiable BUT not contestable.
You scored a point in semantics here, differentiating between falsifiable and contestable. But I'll assume you understood me, and are not easily confused by spelling and punctuation errors as well as noticeable gaffs in semantics.[/b]
that just because the Theory of Evolution is falsifiable is in no
way contrary to it being absolutely true and uncontestable.
Do you understand?
Originally posted by lemon limeI really don't get what you are trying to say. Which claim are you disputing and why:
If something is falsifiable it can be contested. Creationists contest what are purported to be facts by evolutionists and evolutionists contest what are purported to be facts by creationists. This means your OP is self defeating because you have evolutionists who claim there are creationists who claim evolution is not falsifiable, while at the same ...[text shortened]... u fakers I am actually being charitable... because fakers know what they are saying is not true.
1. Evolution is falsifiable.
2. Creationism is not falsifiable.
3. Some creationists claim evolution is not falsifiable.
You keep saying these three claims are somehow self defeating, but I don't understand your explanation.
And no, I am not faking, or otherwise being dishonest, I genuinely believe the above three claims are true - and if I am not mistaken you have already admitted that 1, is true, and would be foolish to claim 3, is not true, so is 2. the one you have a problem with, and if so, how does this make the OP self defeating?
18 Nov 14
Originally posted by twhiteheadHypocrite... is hurling insults and demanding apologies the best you can do? You routinely call people ignorant and stupid if you don't agree with them. So what kind of moron consistently does this to others, but believes it's wrong when done to him? Are you some kind of comedian, or do you really think you deserve an apology?
So instead of an apology you go with insults? Is that the best you can do?
I don't think so. You deserve to get what you give... no more, no less.
Originally posted by wolfgang59... just because the Theory of Evolution is falsifiable is in no
I'm not interested in semantics. I wanted to clear up the fact
that just because the Theory of Evolution is falsifiable is in no
way contrary to it being absolutely true and uncontestable.
Do you understand?
way contrary to it being absolutely true and uncontestable.
Amen brother! Darwin said, you believe it and that settles it! 😵
Originally posted by lemon limePlease provide evidence of this.
Hypocrite... is hurling insults and demanding apologies the best you can do? You routinely call people ignorant and stupid if you don't agree with them.
Where have I hurled an insult at you?
So what kind of moron consistently does this to others, but believes it's wrong when done to him? Are you some kind of comedian, or do you really think you deserve an apology?
You made a false accusation about me and continue to do so, so yes, I think I deserve an apology. Even if you were correct and I routinely insult others, I would still deserve an apology for your false accusation.
18 Nov 14
Originally posted by twhiteheadOkay then, apparently you are not a comedian.
Please provide evidence of this.
Where have I hurled an insult at you?
[b]So what kind of moron consistently does this to others, but believes it's wrong when done to him? Are you some kind of comedian, or do you really think you deserve an apology?
You made a false accusation about me and continue to do so, so yes, I think I deserve an apology ...[text shortened]... rrect and I routinely insult others, I would still deserve an apology for your false accusation.[/b]
Originally posted by lemon limeYou're kidding, right? Evolution was always about existing life evolving to produce new species, hence the title of Darwin's book: The Origin of Species. It was never about the origin of life, stars, galaxies or friggin universes.
If you are relatively new to evolution theory you are probably not annoyed that evolutionists decided to separate the two, and then claim one has nothing to do with the other. It only takes one generation for a change like that to appear acceptable.
Originally posted by lemon limeWay to miss his point.
[b]Falsifiable means that if it were false there would be a way to show
it false.
Same difference.
(Unlike religious beliefs)
Contesting religious beliefs is what evolutionists do when they don't want to consider evidence shown by creationists. It's funny to watch how you shuck and jive and make fun of religion, but won't actually dis ...[text shortened]... ngness to think for yourselves, but you have shown yourselves to be shameless hypocrites.[/b]
Originally posted by lemon limeWay to miss his point, yet again. Are you dumb? Because if you are, you're excused of course. Otherwise, you're a moron. Can't stand for no morons. No, sir.
[b]... just because the Theory of Evolution is falsifiable is in no
way contrary to it being absolutely true and uncontestable.
Amen brother! Darwin said, you believe it and that settles it! 😵[/b]
19 Nov 14
Originally posted by lemon limehe consistently proved you wrong in this thread.
Hypocrite... is hurling insults and demanding apologies the best you can do? You routinely call people ignorant and stupid if you don't agree with them. So what kind of moron consistently does this to others, but believes it's wrong when done to him? Are you some kind of comedian, or do you really think you deserve an apology?
I don't think so. You deserve to get what you give... no more, no less.
furthermore, he even abstained from calling you names (even though you deserve a few)
in return, you have descended deeper and deeper into madness, hurling insults towards anyone who calls you on your crap.
now you don't even argue on the point anymore. you just foam at the mouth even though he keeps trying to engage you honestly in a debate (i for one stopped bothering)
Originally posted by C HessThere was no evidence of origin of species in his book either, I read it.
You're kidding, right? Evolution was always about existing life evolving to produce new species, hence the title of Darwin's book: The Origin of Species. It was never about the origin of life, stars, galaxies or friggin universes.