16 Jun 15
Originally posted by ZahlanziBecause we suspect this is a trick question that you are holding back some key piece of information. The guy needs a lawyer. And as jury we need to hear all the evidence on both sides before we can make an informed verdict.
nobody wants to answer this one either. i can't imagine why.
16 Jun 15
Originally posted by RJHindswhat information could i possibly hold out? that his young daughters were serial killers and deserve to be raped? would that change what he did?
Because we suspect this is a trick question that you are holding back some key piece of information. The guy needs a lawyer. And as jury we need to hear all the evidence on both sides before we can make an informed verdict.
there is no additional information. the guy wanted to give his daughters to a rapey crowd. evil or not?
Originally posted by ZahlanziIf that is all there is too it, then giving his daughter to a rapey crowd does not seem like a logical solution to me. I would vote evil. Now, are you going to tell me were I am wrong?
what information could i possibly hold out? that his young daughters were serial killers and deserve to be raped? would that change what he did?
there is no additional information. the guy wanted to give his daughters to a rapey crowd. evil or not?