Originally posted by josephwOk, I take back the bit I said about 'cleverer'.
You're taxing my brain too early in the morning PK. lol
But I'll give it a try.
[b]What's stopping a land based mammal adpating to life in the water?
The fact that it isn't evolving.
If cetaceans dodn't evolve from land based mammals, why do you think the evidence indicates that they do?
The evidence is really not there. They ma ...[text shortened]...
You have place far more faith in something you know very little about. In reality.[/b]
Originally posted by josephwSo the 70 disciples that went out after the crucifixion, yes many fell out from carrying such burden, and the other 12 known in the Gospels were all charlatans, is this correct?
Since when do we need a mediator?
I follow Christ and no one else. I have the revealed word of God contained in The Book and the indwelling Holy Spirit which teaches me what the will of God is.
Eddy and all the rest of the charlatans out there be damned.
You've been duped!
Originally posted by josephwThe evidence is really not there.
You're taxing my brain too early in the morning PK. lol
But I'll give it a try.
[b]What's stopping a land based mammal adpating to life in the water?
The fact that it isn't evolving.
If cetaceans dodn't evolve from land based mammals, why do you think the evidence indicates that they do?
The evidence is really not there. They ma ...[text shortened]...
You have place far more faith in something you know very little about. In reality.[/b]
Really? And you know this how? Because you've completed an evolutionary biology degree? You've read and refuted all text books and peer reviewed papers on the subject? Or is it because that's want you want to believe?
They make it look that way
Who's 'they'? And how do they make 'it', whatever 'it' is, look that way?
It's like when you google up evolution and you get millions of pages of talk but no substantive evidence.
How do you know what is substantive evidence? You told me a few weeks ago that you'd never read a book on evolution, so how can you be qualified to determine what substantive evidence is?
So in short your argument can be summed up as this -
All the evidence for evolution is 'cooked', made up by scientists over the last 150yrs because they can't accept the fact that all was created. Every scientist who has been involved with the study of evolution has been 'in' on this grand hoax, doctoring the evidence as they go along.
Joseph do you take drugs? If you do, stop taking them now, if you don't, start immediately. You are one seriously paranoid dude.