- Joined
- 29 Dec 08
- Moves
- 6788
Originally posted by @romans1009“I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.” - Galileo Galilei.
Are you really this obtuse? What is arrogant and presumptuous is your thinking you can know all the ways of a completely holy and omniscient God with an eternal perspective, regardless of whether you believe such a being exists or not.
However, let’s suppose it is true that we are thusly limited by God.
“Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
I don’t notice much silence on your part. Instead, you keep applying reasoning that you admit is thusly limited, to support the thesis that your reasoning is thusly limited! And you expect us to accept that?
10 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009lol 🙂 answrer me honestly: do I intimidate you?
If you pick on suzianne, you and I are going to engage in fisticuffs.
10 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009
If you pick on suzianne, you and I are going to engage in fisticuffs.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
11 Feb 18
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelNot at all. Why would you think you did?
lol 🙂 answrer me honestly: do I intimidate you?
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
11 Feb 18
Originally posted by @js357God has told us what He wants us to know (and it’s quite a bit) in the Holy Bible. I was specifically referring in the post you responded to of matters God has chosen to either leave ambiguous or not address. That is what I meant when I said we can’t know *all* the ways of a completely holy and omniscient God with an eternal perspective. We can know some of His ways and His character by reading the Holy Bible and listening to His Holy Spirit. We can’t know everything.
“I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.” - Galileo Galilei.
However, let’s suppose it is true that we are thusly limited by God.
“Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.” - Ludwig Wittgenstein
I don’t notice much silence on your part. Ins ...[text shortened]... , to support the thesis that your reasoning is thusly limited! And you expect us to accept that?
11 Feb 18
1 edit
Originally posted by @romans1009Because you wont answer one question hunestly
Not at all. Why would you think you did?
11 Feb 18
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelSeriously romans, we're going to boycott your crap. We've had enough. You carry your carrots aroundd you like they mean something. you wont meet others halfway, never get into the spirit and in the end have nothing to offer spirituality. And I'm trying to be kind. Boot off or answer a question, I dont have any time left for posers.
Because you wont answer one question hunestly
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
11 Feb 18
Originally posted by @karoly-aczelOh look. The trolls are ganging up on me. Isn’t that special.
Seriously romans, we're going to boycott your crap. We've had enough. You carry your carrots aroundd you like they mean something. you wont meet others halfway, never get into the spirit and in the end have nothing to offer spirituality. And I'm trying to be kind. Boot off or answer a question, I dont have any time left for posers.
What they don’t know is, it’s part of my plan to get all the trolls in one spot, and it’s working beautifully.
Come trolls, come! I’m over here!
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
11 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009All I see in your posts now are 'trolls,' 'lack of substance' and people 'whizzing in the community pool.'
Oh look. The trolls are ganging up on me. Isn’t that special.
What they don’t know is, it’s part of my plan to get all the trolls in one spot, and it’s working beautifully.
Come trolls, come! I’m over here!
In just 2 weeks you have descended into soundbites and brain-numbing tedium.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
11 Feb 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeMaybe one day you’ll discuss substance.
All I see in your posts now are 'trolls,' 'lack of substance' and people 'whizzing in the community pool.'
In just 2 weeks you have descended into soundbites and brain-numbing tedium.
Nah, probably not.
I post plenty of substance but on the occasions when I respond to trolling posts, I label them for what they are.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
11 Feb 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeIsn’t it hilarious that after I called for the trolls, you were the first to show up? Does that make you the head troll?
All I see in your posts now are 'trolls,' 'lack of substance' and people 'whizzing in the community pool.'
In just 2 weeks you have descended into soundbites and brain-numbing tedium.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
11 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Everything you post here is based on a foundation of deception, not substance. You stand alone among the forum regulars as the only poster who is not being themselves.
Maybe one day you’ll discuss substance.
Nah, probably not.
I post plenty of substance but on the occasions when I respond to trolling posts, I label them for what they are.
I honestly pity you.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
11 Feb 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeMaybe one day you’ll discuss substance.
Everything you post here is based on a foundation of deception, not substance. You stand alone among the forum regulars as the only poster who is not being themselves.
I honestly pity you.
Nah, probably not.
I post plenty of substance but on the occasions when I respond to trolling posts, I label them for what they are.
Guess if your post I’m responding to is a trolling post or substantive post. I think even you know when you’re trolling, troll master!
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
11 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009In retrospect, do you wish now you had just stuck with the Fetchmyjunk account?
Maybe one day you’ll discuss substance.
Nah, probably not.
I post plenty of substance but on the occasions when I respond to trolling posts, I label them for what they are.
Guess if your post I’m responding to is a trolling post or substantive post. I think even you know when you’re trolling, troll master!