24 Mar 14
2 edits
Originally posted by FMFswiss gambits posts take up pages themselves with only three or four diagrams per page, care to explain why? in fact his entire post takes up the first four pages. also care to explain why you have not come under your friend special attention for voluminous posting if that really was his motivation?
[b]here is a thread in chess only started by Swissgambit, the first page has three diagrams, the second, third and forth no more tan four or five, it used to be the case that you were allowed only a single fen diagram and a single pgn, so once again, the assertion of voluminous posting is a bare faced lie, you on the other hand have posted only text
http://w ...[text shortened]... .com/board/showthread.php?threadid=158365&page=1
The page at this link as 15 posts on it.[/b]
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou should ask him. So you're deflecting now from discussion of your accusation that someone describing your 37,000+ posts as "voluminous posting" is telling a "barefaced lie"?
so why have you not come under your friends special attention for voluminous posting if that really was his motivation, you have not said. By all accounts you should have.
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by FMFno i am asking you why as a voluminous poster you have not come under his scrutiny if that really was his motivation, by all accounts you should have if the claim of voluminous posting is to be trustworthy.
You should ask him. So you're deflecting now from discussion of your accusation that someone describing your 37,000+ posts as "voluminous posting" is telling a "barefaced lie"?
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAsk people who might have had reason to criticize me. Don't ask me. So what about your barefaced lie" accusation? You posted more than 37,300 times. Who ~ if anyone ~ has been more voluminous in their posting than you? Name a few.
no i am asking you why as a voluminous poster you have not come under his scrutiny if that really was his motivation, by all accounts you should have if the claim of voluminous posting is to be trustworthy.
24 Mar 14
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFsorry you can offer no explanation as to why your friend has not attacked you on the basis of volume yet he has others, because either his claim on the basis of volume is a lie or he should produce evidence that he has also attacked others for the same reason. Can you produce any others that he has attacked because of volume FMF.
Ask people who might have had reason to criticize me. Don't ask me. So what about your barefaced lie" accusation? You posted more than 37,300 times. Who ~ if anyone ~ has been more voluminous in their posting than you? Name a few.
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieEach page of your posting history has 15 posts on it. The first page of this thread has 15 posts on it. The page you linked us to ...
swissgambits post takes up four pages FMF, that should be 4*15, 60 posts according to you, but its not, is it, because diagrams take up more space than text.
http://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=158365&page=1
...has 15 posts on it.
Space is not the issue. Space is your current red herring. It's all about number of posts. There are 15 posts on each page. You have posted more than 37,300 times according to your posting history.
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by divegeesterYes I am and have already notified RHP.
Are you really going to go through with this decision to leave the site?
As I stated in my post to Manny I am leaving because of the issue of being drawn into discussions that I do not want to be drawn into and that always leads to arguing and the such, which I do not want to do anymore.
So if I were to continue on here with this thread with this discussion, that would be hypocritical of me would it not as this is the reason I'm leaving.
Now I've been respectful and responded to you. So please do the same to me and don't ask me again to respond any futher with the on going subject. Thank you....
24 Mar 14
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFfine FMF, but it used to be the case that you were allowed a limited number of diagrams per page. what is more you can post a single iota and it takes up a post, that does not constitute the same volume as a long post of jaywills itself constituting only a single entry, so once again, using the total number of pages to gauge volume is fatally flawed.
Each page of your posting history has 15 posts on it. The first page of this thread has 15 posts on it. The page you linked us to ...
http://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=158365&page=1
...has 15 posts on it.
Space is not the issue. Space is your current red herring. It's all about number of posts. There are 15 posts on each page. You have posted more than 37,300 times according to your posting history.
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAsk people who haven't attacked me why they haven't attacked me. Don't ask me. This is another red herring.
sorry you can offer no explanation as to why your friend has not attacked you on the basis of volume yet he has others, now either his claim on the basis of volume is a lie or he should produce evidence that he has also attacked others for the same reason. Can you produce any others that he has attacked because of volume FMF.
How is it a "barefaced lie" to describe your 37,300+ posts as a "voluminous" posting record?
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo I was right then. 2489 pages @ 15 posts per page = 37,335 posts = voluminous posting. Are people "barefaced liars" to describe 37,335 posts as a "voluminous"?
fine FMF, but it used to be the case that you were allowed a limited number of diagrams per page.
24 Mar 14
4 edits
Originally posted by FMFbelow is a single entry, how much volume does it contain? a dot. You cannot judge volume on the basis of the number of posts, because posts vary greatly in length and thus volume. The assertion therefore stands and total number of posts cannot be an accurate gauge of volume as i have just proven.
So I was right then. 2489 pages @ 15 posts per page = 37,335 posts = voluminous posting. Are people "barefaced liars" to describe 37,335 posts as a "voluminous"?
24 Mar 14
Originally posted by galveston75All the best with your ailing parents. I have had some similar experience. It can be tough and it can be upsetting at times, but as children we have our obligation and we have our love.
Yes I am and have already notified RHP.
As I stated in my post to Manny I am leaving because of the issue of being drawn into discussions that I do not want to be drawn into and that always leads to arguing and the such, which I do not want to do anymore.
So if I were to continue on here with this thread with this discussion, that would be hypocrit ...[text shortened]... same to me and don't ask me again to respond any futher with the on going subject. Thank you....