Forum etiquette

Originally posted by Rajk999
The only thing thats done is that you are making a fool of yourself.

There is one thing these JWs love to be is the victims, the 'persecuted for cause' martyrs.

What Galveston fails to visualise is that in the unlikely (very unlikely) event that I got a ban, he would cease to be the self-proclaimed martyr on this pantomime, I would.

😵

Originally posted by stellspalfie
i dont feel that divegeester has bullied anybody. i find it quite shocking how quick and easy you throw around such a serious word as 'bully'....but then i bow to your expertise, as you spend much of your life telling people they will be punished if they do not conform with your religious views, you are the nearest thing we have to a bully on this forum.

ohhhh but thats where you are wrong palfiedrool, i have an independent third party private message which also acknowledges what has transpired here, in fact all you need to do is provide evidence that your defendant also metes out the same treatment to non Jehovah's witnesses.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
ohhhh but thats where you are wrong palfiedrool, i have an independent third party private message which also acknowledges what has transpired here, in fact all you need to do is provide evidence that your defendant also metes out the same treatment to non Jehovah's witnesses.

What "treatment"? All I've done is call out Galveston for being disingenuous in his reasons for repeatedly avoiding my questions on his threads.

Originally posted by yoctobyte
Why not ignore those that are problematic to you. Sitting here on the side lines, I am on my 3rd bucket of popcorn and the show is getting pretty old.

I Don't know why it has to be this way, y'all are just feeding each other over something that really doesn't matter, IMO.

and the show is getting pretty old

indeed what you are witneesing is what divesgeester intended to do with his thread all along, attempt to use it to humiliate other people, its what he does. Let us reflect upon what we have learned from this thread.

Robbie carrobie is an ace guy. Properknob will defend anyone as long as its against robbie carrobie, same as Stelspalfie. FMF has returned from the dead and seems himself again and divesgeester is the loathsome lowdown snake belly and cowardly bully with ulterior motives that we have known for so long and Rajk is like a cackling crow.

Originally posted by divegeester
What "treatment"? All I've done is call out Galveston for being disingenuous in his reasons for repeatedly avoiding my questions on his threads.

He is under no duress to answer any of your questions, is he?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
... in fact all you need to do is provide evidence that your defendant also metes out the same treatment to non Jehovah's witnesses.

Hang on, are you now saying that you are accusing me of "religionism"?

If all stellspalfie has to do is show that I'm not a religion-racist then you will be happy? So this is not about the "treatment" per-se is it? It is as I suspected about you two jokers being victims.

This is why you kept this thread going all this time to be as you said earlier in the thread ("beat up on me instead" ) the "Vicar of Galveston". You have usurped Galveston's position as victim and are vicariously promoting yourself as the sacrificial robbie.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
He is under no duress to answer any of your questions, is he?

Actually, yes he is. Under the banner of decent forum etiquette.

Have you been reading anything written here.

Originally posted by divegeester
Hang on, are you now saying that you are accusing me of "religionism"?

If all stellspalfie has to do is show that I'm not a religion-racist then you will be happy? So this is not about the "treatment" per-se is it? It is as I suspected about you two jokers being victims.

This is why you kept this thread going all this time to be as you said earlie ...[text shortened]... Galveston's position as victim and are vicariously promoting yourself as the sacrificial robbie.

Strange i don't feel like a victim, have I taken a hit, where is it, cant see it.

Originally posted by divegeester
Actually, yes he is. Under the banner of decent forum etiquette.

Have you been reading anything written here.

No he is not, infact under the banner of forum etiquette if he feels that someone is badgering, forcing and bullying him or uncomfortable answering any questions he has every right to desist. Infact its enshrined into law in some countries, its termed 'taking the fifth' in America and is a safeguard against self incrimination. What in fact is a breach of forum etiquette is forcing someone to answer against their will, starting threads to humiliate them and using there distressing personal circumstances to propagandize, thats a breach of forum etiquette,

Who the hell do you think you are that you can demand a reason from someone? Do you think you are so big that everyone must answer to you? if they don't you will bully them into answering to you? Well Mr Big, suck this up, NO ONE IS UNDER DURESS TO SAY A SINGLE WORD TO YOU and that you disparagingly force contributors to do so using various guises is a real breach of forum etiquette.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
ohhhh but thats where you are wrong palfiedrool, i have an independent third party private message which also acknowledges what has transpired here, in fact all you need to do is provide evidence that your defendant also metes out the same treatment to non Jehovah's witnesses.

you only have a data pool of two j.w's you would need a much larger sample size before you can claim its purely down to your specific religion.
have you ever considered that you may have an anti-social personality.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
and the show is getting pretty old

indeed what you are witneesing is what divesgeester intended to do with his thread all along, attempt to use it to humiliate other people, its what he does. Let us reflect upon what we have learned from this thread.

Robbie carrobie is an ace guy. Properknob will defend anyone as long as its against robbie ca ...[text shortened]... dly bully with ulterior motives that we have known for so long and Rajk is like a cackling crow.

This thread is the best thing in spirituality since the last time wheels fell off the JW wagon.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
you only have a data pool of two j.w's you would need a much larger sample size before you can claim its purely down to your specific religion.
have you ever considered that you may have an anti-social personality.

No I've never considered it, are you going to give me a personal psychotherapy session to determine if its the case?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No he is not, infact under the banner of forum etiquette if he feels that someone is badgering, forcing and bullying him or uncomfortable answering any questions he has every right to desist. Infact its enshrined into law in some countries, its termed 'taking the fifth' in America and is a safeguard against self incrimination. What in fact is a breac ...[text shortened]... paragingly force contributors to do so using various guises is a real breach of forum etiquette.

this isnt a court of law. its just a forum, a forum for debate. why would anybody take the '5th'?????? are you admitting that galveston purposely refused to answer questions on the grounds it might incriminate him???????????

get a sense of perspective!!!!!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No he is not, infact under the banner of forum etiquette if he feels that someone is badgering, forcing and bullying him or uncomfortable answering any questions he has every right to desist. Infact its enshrined into law in some countries, its termed 'taking the fifth' in America and is a safeguard against self incrimination. What in fact is a breac ...[text shortened]... paragingly force contributors to do so using various guises is a real breach of forum etiquette.

Try to take a breath and wipe the drool from your mouth between your fits of rage.

Forum etiquette is indeed under debate and yes Galveston is a prime offender (I haven't even mentioned his constant plagiarism) in failing to answer questions put to him. This is a debate forum and I say it is poor form to ignore polite questions, which all of mine were.

Originally posted by divegeester
This thread is the best thing in spirituality since the last time wheels fell off the JW wagon.

So you hate Jehovahs Witnesses, so you like to humiliate other people, so you get off on it, so what?