Fruit giving instant knowledge of right and wrong to those who eat them (and trees bearing them) has a natural explanation

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes, yes, can you repeat the question,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5Za8HggalY

okay, so we have a non-magical fruit that bestows magical properties on people who eat it and a talking snake who wasn't.

this keeps getting better and better. 😵

[oddly enough, this dysfunctional reasoning does explain how christians can accept multiple contradictions and failed prophecies; they just redefine things to suit their current dogmas.]

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
okay, so we have a non-magical fruit that bestows magical properties on people who eat it and a talking snake who wasn't.

this keeps getting better and better. 😵

[oddly enough, this dysfunctional reasoning does explain how christians can accept multiple contradictions and failed prophecies; they just redefine things to suit their current dogmas.]

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
okay, so we have a non-magical fruit that bestows magical properties on people who eat it and a talking snake who wasn't.

this keeps getting better and better. 😵

[oddly enough, this dysfunctional reasoning does explain how christians can accept multiple contradictions and failed prophecies; they just redefine things to suit their current dogmas.]

Originally posted by stellspalfie
and the non magical flooding of the earth and the non magical storing and mating of 2 of each animal and the non magical disappearance of the flood water.

Originally posted by RJHinds
It must be all lies, right? All these things do not make sense to the natural mind. And of course the supernatural or spiritual world has not been proven to exist by modern science. Case closed. 😏

Originally posted by stellspalfie
lies is a bit strong id say fictional events. id never say case closed, always keep it slightly ajar for the microscopic possibility that christians are correct.

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
we'll, you would have to believe that water didn't evaporate before the flood. that's one of the fun-facts.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no, you would have to believe that there was a water canopy, you zoobs don't know anything, here you have been caught havering about magic trees, magic apples, talking snakes, it seems that your ignorance of scripture really knows no bounds.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
haha!!! water canopy brilliant. did it cover the whole globe or was it kept in one place?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
why don't you do some research and find out instead of being spoon fed.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
like this?

http://www.godandscience.org/youngearth/canopy.html
http://www.icr.org/research/index/researchp_lv_r05/

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no, you would have to believe that there was a water canopy, you zoobs don't know anything, here you have been caught havering about magic trees, magic apples, talking snakes, it seems that your ignorance of scripture really knows no bounds.

Originally posted by Agerg
Ah ok...and was this canopy entirely natural too? If so please explain, or link me to some sites explaining the physics of big old water canopies surrounding the earth

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
do you own research and stop being soon fed.