Spirituality
10 Mar 11
21 Mar 11
Originally posted by menace71The one I saw came straight towards me at incredible speed and then "stopped on a dime " for about half a second, then it shot upwards at incredible speed with no acceleration. Awesome sighting. Thats the only real one I've seen. People have pointed out that it could've been a military craft.
It was night and no clouds. No as far as it did not gradually speed up. It just shot off at what seemed from my reference point to be incredible speed.
I dont think so.
21 Mar 11
1 edit
Originally posted by karoly aczelOh, I see. It is actually very low bandwidth, less than a page on the forums. I will see if I can do a text version...
Your not the first one to say that 🙂
I dont know if it would make a difference for you, but I first experienced this kind of stuff before I went hunting for books on the subject.
For me, the difference is immense.
I'm not about to look into your link, simply because I have limited credit and I would much rather check out ua41's bands version of culties are faulty. I know it.
One who realizes they are blind have one eye open already.
...Turns out, I can't because RHP removes multiple spaces so I can't lay it out. Grrrrr. It's a simple cartoon & will take 15 seconds of your time and virtually zero bandwidth.
http://xkcd.com/808/
--- Penguin
21 Mar 11
Originally posted by karoly aczelWhat I saw I supposed could of been ball lighting but I can't say either way. I would say it was literally an U.F.O. I can tell you what it was not however.
The one I saw came straight towards me at incredible speed and then "stopped on a dime " for about half a second, then it shot upwards at incredible speed with no acceleration. Awesome sighting. Thats the only real one I've seen. People have pointed out that it could've been a military craft.
I dont think so.
* Airplane NO
* Helicopter NO
* Comet/shooting star NO (I guess possible but it was stationary for a long time)
* Bird(s) NO
* Balloons/Blimp ect NO
Manny
21 Mar 11
1 edit
Originally posted by PenguinDidn't I read somewhere that some oil company or other has paid some guy to do map dowsing for them?
Oh, I see. It is actually [b]very low bandwidth, less than a page on the forums. I will see if I can do a text version...
...Turns out, I can't because RHP removes multiple spaces so I can't lay it out. Grrrrr. It's a simple cartoon & will take 15 seconds of your time and virtually zero bandwidth.
http://xkcd.com/808/
--- Penguin[/b]
21 Mar 11
Originally posted by Penguinok. The government gave me a loan. I now have no excuse 🙂
Oh, I see. It is actually [b]very low bandwidth, less than a page on the forums. I will see if I can do a text version...
...Turns out, I can't because RHP removes multiple spaces so I can't lay it out. Grrrrr. It's a simple cartoon & will take 15 seconds of your time and virtually zero bandwidth.
http://xkcd.com/808/
--- Penguin[/b]
Give me a few minutes..
22 Mar 11
Originally posted by karoly aczelIt was sort of apropos of your mention of Bob Frissell who wrote the book where you got your ideas about aliens and extra dimensions. I looked him and his book up and it reminded me of that xkcd cartoon.
Hey Penguin- very funny sketches, I viewed about 5 of them, was one of them a specific answer to anything we were discussing (?)
(bit rushed right now)
One of the things that he states is that 'free energy' machines exist (apparently on page 154) If you have the book, look it up and tell me if he really does say this and what evidence he provides for the assertion.
If free energy machines really did exist, then the first energy company to discover them would wipe out all competition by patenting and selling them. The fact that they have not implies either that such machines do not exist and Bob Frissell is talking bollox or that energy companies are not that bothered about making money...
Which do you think is more likely?
--- Penguin.
22 Mar 11
1 edit
Originally posted by PenguinI do believe that he says that on pg. 154, lets see... well maybe on another page.
It was sort of apropos of your mention of Bob Frissell who wrote the book where you got your ideas about aliens and extra dimensions. I looked him and his book up and it reminded me of that xkcd cartoon.
One of the things that he states is that 'free energy' machines exist (apparently on page 154) If you have the book, look it up and tell me if he really ...[text shortened]... not that bothered about making money...
Which do you think is more likely?
--- Penguin.
The powers that be are entrenched in oil based fuels. We've had the bronze age and the gold age etc. These years will be known as the oil years.
So much of the worlds money is tied up in it.
These people dont want you to have free energy or even cheap energy.
Tell me this: Why are there children starving in our world? Because there is not enough food?
edit: page 153. "So the powers that be haven't wanted us to know about these free energy machines either, but it is inevitable. According to Drunvalo they have been presented to the United Nations and it is now only a matter of time before this information becomes public."
The picture this book paints is consistent with the crap I see going on around me everyday.
22 Mar 11
Originally posted by PenguinAnd again, put another way, there is a big , evil force that holds us in our patterns on materiality and survival, where we are spiritual beings and thus must live, not only survive.
It was sort of apropos of your mention of Bob Frissell who wrote the book where you got your ideas about aliens and extra dimensions. I looked him and his book up and it reminded me of that xkcd cartoon.
One of the things that he states is that 'free energy' machines exist (apparently on page 154) If you have the book, look it up and tell me if he really ...[text shortened]... not that bothered about making money...
Which do you think is more likely?
--- Penguin.
For this and other "control" reasons, we have created a world that reflects our minds/intentions.
Or did you think you had no power over the outside world?
25 Mar 11
Originally posted by karoly aczelSorry not to have replied on this one. I was just amazed that you would fall for that one. You are implying a huge conspiracy here that is orders of magnitude greater than I think the 'powers that be' are capable of sustaining.
I do believe that he says that on pg. 154, lets see... well maybe on another page.
The powers that be are entrenched in oil based fuels. We've had the bronze age and the gold age etc. These years will be known as the oil years.
So much of the worlds money is tied up in it.
These people dont want you to have free energy or even cheap energy.
Te ...[text shortened]...
The picture this book paints is consistent with the crap I see going on around me everyday.
Any scientist discovering this would publish. Yes they would initially be ridiculed but I don't think it would be long before the scientific community realised. And they are not all under the control of oil companies. If the conspiracy is successful then this guy would not be aware of it. If it has failed to keep him quiet then it would also fail to keep quiet the people who can actually demonstrate that the 2nd law of thermodynamics is wrong and our entire understanding of physics needs to be thrown out.
Somewhere in the world, a company or a country would develop this and free themselves from reliance on an expensive fuel obtained largely from unstable countries. And they would not keep this quiet.
Watergate
Profumo
The dodgy Iraq dossier
Wikileaks
If they failed to keep the above under wraps, I really don't think they would be able to hide something this big.
It is an extaordinary claim. I would need extraordinary evidence before believing it. You seem to be the ther way round: the more unlikely the claim, the less evidence you need before believing it.
--- Penguin.
25 Mar 11
Originally posted by PenguinSure, I see your view on this. Thnx for the reply.
Sorry not to have replied on this one. I was just amazed that you would fall for that one. You are implying a huge conspiracy here that is orders of magnitude greater than I think the 'powers that be' are capable of sustaining.
Any scientist discovering this would publish. Yes they would initially be ridiculed but I don't think it would be long before the ...[text shortened]... the more unlikely the claim, the less evidence you need before believing it.
--- Penguin.
If indeed what is claimed is true, it should be coming out in the next few years.