Spirituality
30 Nov 11
Originally posted by LemonJelloAre we down there with the morons?
I know you are not responsive to reason, either, Tweedledum. You have demonstrated that quite conclusively through, for example, your childish and ignorant views regarding homosexuality.
Are you now under the further delusion that I have been trying to "prove to people that there is no God" in this thread? Can you read? I just got done agreeing wi ...[text shortened]... I'll save the actual debating for persons who merit the effort. You and RJ do not qualify.
Originally posted by LemonJelloI am responsive to reason just not to yours or atheists in general.
I know you are not responsive to reason, either, Tweedledum. You have demonstrated that quite conclusively through, for example, your childish and ignorant views regarding homosexuality.
Are you now under the further delusion that I have been trying to "prove to people that there is no God" in this thread? Can you read? I just got done agreeing wi ...[text shortened]... I'll save the actual debating for persons who merit the effort. You and RJ do not qualify.
I have no views on homosexuality so its your views on homossexuality that is ignorant and childish. What I said is that the Bible said tht homosexuality is a sin. What is still baffling to this day is that an atheist cares what the Bible says. That truly amazing.
I never referred to you proving anything in this thread. In general you try to prove your atheist position to theists. That alone makes you rather insecure in your beliefs. It must be worrying that maybe there is a God out there ... 😀 .. who wont like what you say about him.
Originally posted by Rajk999If you were responsive to reason you wouldn't care who was making the argument,
I am responsive to reason just not to yours or atheists in general.
I have no views on homosexuality so its your views on homossexuality that is ignorant and childish. What I said is that the Bible said tht homosexuality is a sin. What is still baffling to this day is that an atheist cares what the Bible says. That truly amazing.
I never referred to yo ...[text shortened]... be worrying that maybe there is a God out there ... 😀 .. who wont like what you say about him.
only whether the argument itself was reasonable.
Atheists only care what the bible says, when theists take it literally.
And then it's only that we care what the theists think it says.
And speaking for myself, and all the atheists I know personally....
We really don't worry about whether there is a god or not, not even a little bit.
Originally posted by Rajk999I have no views on homosexuality so its your views on homossexuality that is ignorant and childish.
I am responsive to reason just not to yours or atheists in general.
I have no views on homosexuality so its your views on homossexuality that is ignorant and childish. What I said is that the Bible said tht homosexuality is a sin. What is still baffling to this day is that an atheist cares what the Bible says. That truly amazing.
I never referred to yo ...[text shortened]... be worrying that maybe there is a God out there ... 😀 .. who wont like what you say about him.
An example of Tweedledum logic in action.
What is still baffling to this day is that an atheist cares what the Bible says. That truly amazing.
I see that you are still confused. I do not care what the bible says, per se. I care, however, about the prevailing social climate on a broad range of issues. What's truly amazing here is that the prevailing social climate is still significantly informed by ridiculous notions from -- no joke -- the Dark Ages. To see this, we have to look no further than your view on homosexuality (yes, you do have a view on it).
As for the rest, yes I am shaking in my boots about the possibility that there is a God out there. I'm sure such a being would absolutely smite me for not having sufficient reason to believe that He exists. After all, that sounds like the epitome of love and justice, right?
Originally posted by googlefudgeThat's why the Creator wants you to believe by God given faith.
You have no evidence for the existence of god, slim evidence for the existence of JC, and
no evidence of JC's divinity.
You are asserting something as true without any possible way of knowing if it were true.
You can't even demonstrate god's existence, let alone any properties god might have.
Originally posted by LemonJelloI get it. Atheists want to control what people think. You think that all people must believe that homosexuality is not a sin, just so that the gays will be happy. Well thats tough. Aint gonna happen. Gays will have to do what they do without the blessing of the Christian community. Get used to it. Grow some balls and go live your life without begging others to support you.
[b]I have no views on homosexuality so its your views on homossexuality that is ignorant and childish.
An example of Tweedledum logic in action.
What is still baffling to this day is that an atheist cares what the Bible says. That truly amazing.
I see that you are still confused. I do not care what the bible says, per se. I care, how ...[text shortened]... o believe that He exists. After all, that sounds like the epitome of love and justice, right?[/b]
Originally posted by Rajk999There we go. Now your true colors are coming out.
I get it. Atheists want to control what people think. You think that all people must believe that homosexuality is not a sin, just so that the gays will be happy. Well thats tough. Aint gonna happen. Gays will have to do what they do without the blessing of the Christian community. Get used to it. Grow some balls and go live your life without begging others to support you.
Why don't you try stepping out of the Dark Ages, Rajk? Hasn't anyone informed you that it is 2011?
You're still confused. I do not think that all people must believe a certain way. I just think in general that one ought to have good reasons for his views. Alas, that's obviously way too advanced for ya.
Originally posted by LemonJelloThere we go. Now your true colors are coming out.
There we go. Now your true colors are coming out.
Why don't you try stepping out of the Dark Ages, Rajk? Hasn't anyone informed you that it is 2011?
You're still confused. I do not think that all people must believe a certain way. I just think in general that one ought to have good reasons for his views. Alas, that's obviously way too advanced for ya.
You feel that your views are superior and all people must use your reasoning to form their conclusions. Well pal, thats pretty arrogant of you.
I respect your right to believe that there is no God and to live your life as you see fit. Clearly you dont respect the right of theists to believe in the laws of God and to live as they see fit.
You and your type are intolerant. Your atheists views and your need for approval have made you arrogant and intolerant. Pathetic... with all your superior ability to reason you cannot see that.
Originally posted by Rajk999Yes, I am very "arrogant" and "intolerant" to suggest that one ought to have good reasons for his views, particularly when those views contribute to the prevailing social climate on important issues that impact the lives of many. How crazy, arrogant, and intolerant of me to suggest you ought to have some at least rudimentary justification for your endorsements! "The invisible man in the sky has spoken and says it is bad" does not count as justification, Rajk. You need to get with the times. It is no longer the Dark Ages; and you are no longer a child.
There we go. Now your true colors are coming out.
You feel that your views are superior and all people must use your reasoning to form their conclusions. Well pal, thats pretty arrogant of you.
I respect your right to believe that there is no God and to live your life as you see fit. Clearly you dont respect the right of theists to believe in the laws ...[text shortened]... rogant and intolerant. Pathetic... with all your superior ability to reason you cannot see that.
Originally posted by LemonJelloWhat are the good reasons for your views? I haven't heard any yet.
Yes, I am very "arrogant" and "intolerant" to suggest that one ought to have good reasons for his views, particularly when those views contribute to the prevailing social climate on important issues that impact the lives of many. How crazy, arrogant, and intolerant of me to suggest you ought to have some at least rudimentary justification for your endors ...[text shortened]... need to get with the times. It is no longer the Dark Ages; and you are no longer a child.
Originally posted by LemonJelloGet with the times? Hilarious!
Yes, I am very "arrogant" and "intolerant" to suggest that one ought to have good reasons for his views, particularly when those views contribute to the prevailing social climate on important issues that impact the lives of many. How crazy, arrogant, and intolerant of me to suggest you ought to have some at least rudimentary justification for your endors need to get with the times. It is no longer the Dark Ages; and you are no longer a child.
Just so that gays can be happy ?
No way pal.
I rather be a child of God than a man of this world.
End of story.