Originally posted by whodeyAlright, I will tell you.
You tell me.
Conservatives are hunted down like dogs with the IRS. Why not the religious? Then there is the tax exempt status of churches which could be taken away if they don't see things a certain way etc.
Really the options are limitless in a government that has no more checks and balances.
Nothing.
01 Jun 15
Originally posted by FMFThe problem is that there is no such thing as a righteous Muslim. 😏
Leaders and public figures all around the world, including Obama, in almost every country, and including politicians and leaders in Muslim countries, have condemned the atrocities of the Islamic terrorists, in forthright terms and consistently, noting their professed Islamism and their claims to be on a divine mission, and contrasting it with how Islam is a reli ...[text shortened]... no problem with rejecting the terrorists' claims to be righteous Muslims doing the work of God.
01 Jun 15
Originally posted by RJHindsNo, the problem is that you are unable to comprehend a righteous Muslim. That is quite different.
The problem is that there is no such thing as a righteous Muslim. 😏
Indeed, your own sense of righteousness is nothing more than bigoted arrogance. You couldn't be further from God if you tried.
01 Jun 15
Originally posted by whodeyIn other words, you are a republican.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/04/28/hillary-clinton-gives-rare-glimpse-into-her-christian-faith/
We got a rare look, and I do mean rare, at Hillary Clinton's religious beliefs.
She seems to be driven to spread "social justice" in the name of Jesus.
Is this a violation of church and state? Is she a fundamentalist wacko?
02 Jun 15
KazetNagorra: What, exactly, do you fear Hillary Clinton will do to "coerce" people to change their (religious) beliefs in the case that she is elected president?So you are asking KazetNagorra to imagine what she might do to force people to change their religious beliefs ~ and you are asking him to tell you what it is ~ and then that's what you're accusing Hillary Clinton of doing in the future?
Originally posted by whodey
You tell me.
Originally posted by FMFWhodey is complaining repeatedly about Presidents being influenced by their relgious beliefs, but he refuses to agree that therefore an atheist would be a better President as they have no religious beliefs; but more confusingly Whodey is unable explain how a theist would be better at keeping thier religious beliefs from influencing their decisions than an atheist would be. I'm reminded of a puppy chasing its tail.
So you are asking KazetNagorra to imagine what she might do to force people to change their religious beliefs ~ and you are asking him to tell you what it is ~ and then that's what you're accusing Hillary Clinton of doing in the future?
02 Jun 15
Originally posted by divegeesterBut an atheist believes in Evilution, which is worse. 😏
Whodey is complaining repeatedly about Presidents being influenced by their relgious beliefs, but he refuses to agree that therefore an atheist would be a better President as they have no religious beliefs; but more confusingly Whodey is unable explain how a theist would be better at keeping thier religious beliefs from influencing their decisions than an atheist would be. I'm reminded of a puppy chasing its tail.
Originally posted by RJHindsSo a Muslim living in a country where he or she never heard of JC and the boys but peace loving and would never harm a fly but in fact would help anyone in trouble, Christian or Muslim, that person will still go to Hell in your fantasy world, right?
The problem is that there is no such thing as a righteous Muslim. 😏