Originally posted by stellspalfieThat's a broad question isn't it?
so you think its okay to follow the tradition of the local culture?
In the case of Mary and Joseph, their following Hebrew tradition was ok.
Are you trying to stretch some point beyond this scope?
No, IE. I do not think it is ok to follow any tradition of any and every local culture all the time in every circumstance.
Originally posted by sonshipyou (id like to think) would not have sex with or impregnate a child. if you were to visit and live in all cultures that do, you would not adopt that aspect of their culture (id like to think, correct me if im wrong). so sonship, why wouldnt you adopt that aspect of their culture?
That's a broad question isn't it?
In the case of Mary and Joseph, their following Hebrew tradition was ok.
Are you trying to stretch some point beyond this scope?
No, IE. I do not think it is ok to follow any tradition of any and every local culture all the time in every circumstance.
Originally posted by bbarrI live in Wisconsin. Spent most of my adult life here. Lived and worked all over the country for decades. Always came back home to Wisconsin. I'll never move away again. Wisconsin is best. IMO.
My wife is pretty great. She's from Wisconsin, so she has a natural advantage. She insists we eat a lot of kale, which strikes me as depraved. Other than that, though...
Originally posted by josephwthere are many ways in which marriage can be a moral issue. it would be immoral for a 40yr old man to marry a 10year old child regardless of how mature she was, would it not?
I don't recommend marriage for anyone under 25. 30 for men. I don't see it as a moral question. It's a question of maturity.
Originally posted by stellspalfie
you (id like to think) would not have sex with or impregnate a child. if you were to visit and live in all cultures that do, you would not adopt that aspect of their culture (id like to think, correct me if im wrong). so sonship, why wouldnt you adopt that aspect of their culture?
I was brought up in this culture and would probably be so prior influenced, I would find it against my own cultural upbringing.
Is there some little corner you are hoping to get me to paint myself into here?
Originally posted by josephwBest people I've ever met. Hopefully we'll be able to make the move from Seattle to Madison when we get around to having kids. Where are you in WI?
I live in Wisconsin. Spent most of my adult life here. Lived and worked all over the country for decades. Always came back home to Wisconsin. I'll never move away again. Wisconsin is best. IMO.
Originally posted by sonshipyou appear to be saying that the age of consent is purely a cultural issue and not one of morality. im sure you do not actually believe this, for example if a culture existed where men can marry and have sex with an infant, im sure you would say it is immoral regardless of the culture.you (id like to think) would not have sex with or impregnate a child. if you were to visit and live in all cultures that do, you would not adopt that aspect of their culture (id like to think, correct me if im wrong). so sonship, why wouldnt you adopt that aspect of their culture?
I was brought up in this culture and would probably be s ...[text shortened]... pbringing.
Is there some little corner you are hoping to get me to paint myself into here?
im not hoping for you to paint yourself anywhere, being a christian you are already in the corner.
Originally posted by stellspalfieSuppose she's an orphan, at risk of becoming a child prostitute, and the local customs don't allow adoption for some reason, the man marries her, doesn't consummate the marriage and then allows her to divorce when she's old enough to fend for herself or marry someone more appropriate?
there are many ways in which marriage can be a moral issue. it would be immoral for a 40yr old man to marry a 10year old child regardless of how mature she was, would it not?
Contrived I agree, but it's always possible to find exceptions.
Originally posted by DeepThoughtYes there are always exceptions, but they typically rely on one wrong being the lesser of two wrongs, rather than it being right.
Contrived I agree, but it's always possible to find exceptions.
So when someone states that a given act is immoral they typically are implicitly saying 'assuming the people in question don't have a gun pointed at their heads, or other extenuating circumstances'.
In fact I could think of definitions of marriage in which I would readily say that underage marriage is perfectly acceptable. But again, that would be kind of cheating.
Originally posted by stellspalfieI would say that the exact age of consent is at least in part cultural. I can think of no argument for why a particular age is better than any other. Humans continue to mature throughout their lives, typically making better decisions as they age (up to a point). But I am not convinced that this is a good argument for not marrying till you are fifty.
you appear to be saying that the age of consent is purely a cultural issue and not one of morality.
I am not sure what josephws recommendation amounts to. Does he expect people to sleep around until they are 25-30, or does he expect them to remain abstinent till then?