Originally posted by stellspalfieWhat full talk is this? I have heard it said that apes do not have protruding nasal bones like humans so that wearing eyeglasses would be difficult for them. Perhaps that is what your expert was referring to.
if you watch the full talk, your so called expert says apes dont have nasal bones .............why would your 'expert' make such a basic error?
The Instructor
Originally posted by SwissGambitSo predictable with the attacks to make you evolutionist look so superior.
I bet even the 8 year old knows how to spell waste.
So yes I'm not as educated as you high and mighties are and I'm not ashamed of it.
But I know in the Bible God assures that he is not impressed with the knowlegde of man "at all" as "it is foolishness with him and compared to him" and their bragging of it but he is looking for the meek and simple ones to bestow his blessings on. It is no human I try to impress and worry about with the wicked insults that can come out of their hearts.
Perhaps if you'd try to answer the questions put before you about proving "what obviously can be proved" evolution, you may not make yourself look so juvenile by saying foolish syatements as you just did. It does not help your case...
Originally posted by sonshipIf you take away the maniacal laughter and the partisan voice-over maybe
Dr.David Menton: Lucy - - She's No Lady
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6RfIEVO6YQ
you could use your own mind and figure that maybe a 3 million year old
skeleton may be a little distorted?
Easier to believe than the disappearance of X million skeletons from 4,000 years ago. (The flood)
Originally posted by wolfgang59How about hungry shark eating the floating bodies or maybe other hungry fish or maybe whales swallowing them like Jonah? There has been a lot of human skeletons discovered with varing interpretations given. Don't be ignorant.
If you take away the maniacal laughter and the partisan voice-over maybe
you could use your own mind and figure that maybe a 3 million year old
skeleton may be a little distorted?
Easier to believe than the disappearance of X million skeletons from 4,000 years ago. (The flood)
The Instructor
Originally posted by galveston75Oh pfft, stop acting like you actually want to hear the case for evolution. That whole thread of yours is mere trolling. Your mind is locked down tighter than a SuperMax prison on high alert when it comes to the theory of evolution.
So predictable with the attacks to make you evolutionist look so superior.
So yes I'm not as educated as you high and mighties are and I'm not ashamed of it.
But I know in the Bible God assures that he is not impressed with the knowlegde of man "at all" as "it is foolishness with him and compared to him" and their bragging of it but he is looking fo ...[text shortened]... elf look so juvenile by saying foolish syatements as you just did. It does not help your case...
Originally posted by RJHindsthe full version of the clip posted in the op. his words are 'apes do not have nasal bones'.
What full talk is this? I have heard it said that apes do not have protruding nasal bones like humans so that wearing eyeglasses would be difficult for them. Perhaps that is what your expert was referring to.
The Instructor
Originally posted by sonshipLets pretend that the pelvis is as he suggests.
Dr.David Menton: Lucy - - She's No Lady
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6RfIEVO6YQ
By his own arguments Lucy would not be able to walk upright.
So how does he explain all the other features which point to bipedalism?
(I think the strongest is the curved spine)
??????????????????????????????????????
AND FINALLY
Not everyone is convinced Lucy is our ancestor anyway -
could be a dead-end. An extinct cousin.
Originally posted by wolfgang59And maybe it is just another hoax. Yeah, that's it. Problem solved.
Lets pretend that the pelvis is as he suggests.
By his own arguments Lucy would not be able to walk upright.
So how does he explain all the other features which point to bipedalism?
(I think the strongest is the curved spine)
??????????????????????????????????????
AND FINALLY
Not everyone is convinced Lucy is our ancestor anyway -
could be a dead-end. An extinct cousin.
The Instructor