Originally posted by RBHILLPangaea was a supercontinent that existed 300 million years ago.
Well first off the world was called Pangaea. Then when the floods came in the huge earthquakes moved all the continents then maybe after that it froze after a few years or whatever. Because before the flood it did not rain. And Pangaea probably had the perfect climate.
https://www.google.com/search?site=&source=hp&ei=PD9rUqiXFYzbiwLDjIHABw&q=Pangaea&oq=Panga ...[text shortened]... .7347.7347.0.10322.2.1.0.1.1.0.443.443.4-1.1.0....0...1c..29.mobile-gws-hp..0.2.467.NOQHTUQJMco#
And it did rain.
Originally posted by wolfgang59Well according to the word of God it didn't rain until the flood that's why no one else gotten to the boat except for eight people plus whatever animals were put in. And if you go to Google it shows you what Pangaea looked like. And it shows nothing at the north and south pole that would show ice. There's no evidence to show that earth is that old.
Pangaea was a supercontinent that existed 300 million years ago.
And it did rain.
Originally posted by RBHILLSo you take as valid evidence a random Googled picture because it fits with your claim, but ignore anything else that scientists say about it because it doesn't fit.
And if you go to Google it shows you what Pangaea looked like. And it shows nothing at the north and south pole that would show ice. There's no evidence to show that earth is that old.
Sorry, but you can't have Pangea and reject the rest of science.
Originally posted by RBHILLThere IS solid evidence that 8 or 10 people in the so-called Ark could not possibly have spread the genetic variations we see now in humans in only whatever the myth says, 6000 years? 5000? Whatever, there has not been enough time to see the obvious variations in DNA inn that amount of time. People totally isolated from one another with very different gene variations cannot happen in that short amount of time. Sorry to spoil your party.
Well according to the word of God it didn't rain until the flood that's why no one else gotten to the boat except for eight people plus whatever animals were put in. And if you go to Google it shows you what Pangaea looked like. And it shows nothing at the north and south pole that would show ice. There's no evidence to show that earth is that old.
NOT.
Originally posted by sonhouseThere has been more than enough time. It don't take millions of years. Adam and Eve possessed genes to produce all the variety and races of men. There is not enough time by evilution, but they were created.
There IS solid evidence that 8 or 10 people in the so-called Ark could not possibly have spread the genetic variations we see now in humans in only whatever the myth says, 6000 years? 5000? Whatever, there has not been enough time to see the obvious variations in DNA inn that amount of time. People totally isolated from one another with very different gene variations cannot happen in that short amount of time. Sorry to spoil your party.
NOT.
The Instructor
Originally posted by sonhouseNoah's three sons having lots of children and their children have lots of children. If you can find it online there's a genealogy through one of the kings over in Europe and he's like 160 to maybe 300 something from Adam I forget. Because they keep records and stuff of Kings. If the generations had children every 20 years that is 225 and 4500 years. And if you did two to the power of 225. Or going 2×2×2 225 times, that equals a really high number. 45 times makes 35.184 trillion. Also before the flood they estimated 1 billion people and that was about 1656 years.
There IS solid evidence that 8 or 10 people in the so-called Ark could not possibly have spread the genetic variations we see now in humans in only whatever the myth says, 6000 years? 5000? Whatever, there has not been enough time to see the obvious variations in DNA inn that amount of time. People totally isolated from one another with very different gene variations cannot happen in that short amount of time. Sorry to spoil your party.
NOT.