Originally posted by FabianFnas
Your avoiding my question:
Do you really think that a child must pay church tax to be called a christian?
Edit: Oh, sorry. I was expecting Eladar to answer this question...
Your avoiding my question:
Do you really think that a child must pay church tax to be called a christian?
Huh?
No.
And what is a "church tax" (in the New Testament) ?
Edit: Oh, sorry. I was expecting Eladar to answer this question...
Oh.
Originally posted by EladarNo response from Eladar.
Do you think that a child, not paying church tax, cannot be christian?
Originally posted by FabianFnas
Do you think that a child, not paying church tax, cannot be christian?
So he really think that church tax is one of the pillars of christianity?
22 Jun 17
Originally posted by dj2beckerIt is impossible for something to not be 'indoctrination' as there is no such thing as a truly neutral position.
I'm guessing most people have been exposed to some form of religious indoctrination. Some people argue that this is a form of child abuse.
Other people would argue that it is the most common form of social acculturation.
They argue that people teach their children the things they believe and the things they think they should know. And that’s what has been going on for millennia.
What are your thoughts on the issue?
"Religious indoctrination" implies that secular humanism has no element of indoctrination, when in fact it comes with a series of assumptions about the world and often times very heavy value judgments.
It is hard to find a group of people less preachy & self-righteous than the secular humanist Social Justice Warriors.
Originally posted by Jacob VervilleI notice you have capitalized the words "social" and "justice" and also used what may seem a bit like a sneer word ~ "warriors" ~ and capitalized that too. "Social Justice Warriors".
...the secular humanist Social Justice Warriors.
Are you talking about a particular organization - "SJW" perhaps? - if so is there a web site? I'd be interested in what their message is and to see if your attempted dismissal of it with the words "preachy" and "self-righteous" is justified. How many members do they have?
Or are you just taking a catch-all [and, dare I say, a "preachy" and "self-righteous"] swing at just about anyone active in working for a better world who happens to not share your religious beliefs?
Originally posted by Jacob VervilleWelcome to the site 🙂
It is impossible for something to not be 'indoctrination' as there is no such thing as a truly neutral position.
"Religious indoctrination" implies that secular humanism has no element of indoctrination, when in fact it comes with a series of assumptions about the world and often times very heavy value judgments.
It is hard to find a group of people less preachy & self-righteous than the secular humanist Social Justice Warriors.
23 Jun 17
Originally posted by Jacob VervilleAnything to back up your ridiculous claims?
It is impossible for something to not be 'indoctrination' as there is no such thing as a truly neutral position.
"Religious indoctrination" implies that secular humanism has no element of indoctrination, when in fact it comes with a series of assumptions about the world and often times very heavy value judgments.
It is hard to find a group of people less preachy & self-righteous than the secular humanist Social Justice Warriors.
Originally posted by Rajk999And if that indoctrination includes the idea of strapping on a bomb and blowing yourself and 10 other people to bits, wouldn't that be abuse? Sounds like to me.
I would say that religious instruction should come without consequences.
Religious indoctrination / brain washing has to do with time and done over a long period.
The type that constitutes abuse has dire consequences if the rules are not followed eg excommunication, shunning and other family relationship .consequences.
I personally experienced all types ...[text shortened]... portant for those who have been through it, not to pass that behavior on to the next generation.