Spirituality
11 Nov 06
Originally posted by bbarrDepending on the nature and severity of the disrespect and the maturity and moral responsibility of the child, I don't see why not.
Wow. You think that Jesus thought that it would be just for woman to be executed for committing adultery? Do you think he thought it would be just for a child to be executed for disrespecting his parents?
In many cultures (including my own), the traditional penalty for violence against one's parents is death.
Originally posted by lucifershammerIf the solution you propose is execution of those kids, that's a cure that's far worse than the disease.
Just because your culture seems to tolerate kids treating their parents like dirt and parents killing off their kids at a whim doesn't mean the rest of us have to buy it.
Wouldn't you rather have your kid alive and disrepectful of you, than stoned to death with the scales of justice putatively rebalanced?
Originally posted by lucifershammerWait a minute...you go all gaga over an abortion AND think that the penalty for a kid punching his father should be death!? Just where the heck is your culture...?
Depending on the nature and severity of the disrespect and the maturity and moral responsibility of the child, I don't see why not.
In many cultures (including my own), the traditional penalty for violence against one's parents is death.
TheSkipper
Originally posted by lucifershammerThe best it shows is that Jesus changed his opinion and views at the woman's persistence. Do you deny that the passage shows a not so pleasant Jesus?
Is that what it shows? Why does Jesus heal the woman's daughter anyway, then? Why does he heal the Roman centurion's servant?
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesI would rather show mercy and forgiveness yes -- that doesn't mean the scales of justice are any different.
If the solution you propose is execution of those kids, that's a cure that's far worse than the disease.
Wouldn't you rather have your kid alive and disrepectful of you, than stoned to death with the scales of justice putatively rebalanced?
Originally posted by kirksey957In isolation, yes. But seen in context as to how Jesus deals with other people that come to him for grace/healing (e.g. the rich young man, the father of the possessed boy), I see a very consistent pattern -- and it's not the one most people think.
The best it shows is that Jesus changed his opinion and views at the woman's persistence. Do you deny that the passage shows a not so pleasant Jesus?
Originally posted by lucifershammerSo, if you forgive a child for the acts of disrepect that you cite, an entailment of your forgiveness is an acknowledgment that you ought to throw rocks at his head until he becomes a lifeless mass of flesh, but that you prefer not to do so.
I would rather show mercy and forgiveness yes -- that doesn't mean the scales of justice are any different.
Originally posted by lucifershammerOnly a nutcase would think that killing a child for "disrespecting a parent" "balances" the scales of justice. Ditto for killing a woman for committing adultery. I see no evidence that Jesus was as much of a psycho as you (as far as these issues are concerned anyway).
I would rather show mercy and forgiveness yes -- that doesn't mean the scales of justice are any different.