Job vs karma

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Rape is evil? Yes or No?

It is neither evil, nor non-evil, nor both, nor neither😵

Originally posted by @black-beetle
It is neither evil, nor non-evil, nor both, nor neither😵

Ok, so why is it a crime?

Originally posted by @divegeester
My thanks, you too.

Oh I 'm training hard these days and it's impossible, but it would be most welcome, thanks divegeester! Hope you and yours are good😵

Originally posted by @black-beetle
Oh I 'm training hard these days and it's impossible, but it would be most welcome, thanks divegeester! Hope you and yours are good😵

All good here thank you; reciprocated.

Training as in hard physical exercise such as running?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Ok, so why is it a crime?

Because, according to our consensus, one has not the right to force an adult person to have sexual intercourse against the will of that person😵

Originally posted by @black-beetle
Because, according to our consensus, one has not the right to force an adult person to have sexual intercourse against the will of that person😵

So if people agreed to kill off minorities that wouldn't be evil either. Makes sense. 😵

Originally posted by @divegeester
All good here thank you; reciprocated.

Training as in hard physical exercise such as running?

Yes, indoors cycling, following Friel's protocol, 12 hours weekly😵

Originally posted by @dj2becker
So if people agreed to kill off minorities that wouldn't be evil either. Makes sense. 😵

Whenever people agree to kill off minorities, they should be punished severely because killing is a crime😵

Originally posted by @black-beetle
Whenever people agree to kill off minorities, they should be punished severely because killing is a crime😵

In this scenario people would have agreed that 'killing off minorities' was not a crime.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
In this scenario people would have agreed that 'killing off minorities' was not a crime.

And it would still be a crime because their agreement and their actions break the law, turning them instantly into criminals😵

Originally posted by @black-beetle
And it would still be a crime because their agreement and their actions break the law, turning them instantly into criminals😵

If different societies agree on laws that contradict each other which society has the correct laws?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
If different societies agree on laws that contradict each other which society has the correct laws?

Since "correct" and "wrong" are based solely on our consensus according to the laws of each country and, also, according to the international law, in your paradigm the members of each society would claim that solely their consensus is legal. The legal institutions (International Court) would decide what is "correct" and what is "wrong" according to the international law😵

Originally posted by @black-beetle
Since "correct" and "wrong" are based solely on our consensus according to the laws of each country and, also, according to the international law, in your paradigm the members of each society would claim that solely their consensus is legal. The legal institutions (International Court) would decide what is "correct" and what is "wrong" according to the international law😵

No sane person could ever argue that rape, for example, is right, regardless of what people decide. Why is that?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
No sane person could ever argue that rape, for example, is right, regardless of what people decide. Why is that?

Because, regardless of what each sane or insane individual could decide, mirroring our international consensus and thus our international law we all agree that rape is a crime😵

Originally posted by @black-beetle
Because, regardless of what each sane or insane individual could decide, mirroring our international consensus and thus our international law we all agree that rape is a crime😵

So rape is not intrinsically wrong?