Spirituality
15 Dec 12
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneWhich is why people like you should be locked into a padded cell and not allowed any sharp objects.
[b]Even though this incident is less traumatic, it never the less illustrates, there is a problem with people in general.
Which is why guns should be banned.[/b]
Go troll elsewhere, I've seen enough of you for this and the next 5 lifetimes.
15 Dec 12
Originally posted by ChessPraxisMy my, the non-sequitur hissy fit.
Which is why people like you should be locked into a padded cell and not allowed any sharp objects.
Go troll elsewhere, I've seen enough of you for this and the next 5 lifetimes.
That's one fragile little ego you got there kid.
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneThe USA will never, ever ban guns (without facing a revolt). The right to bear arms is completely fundamental to the structure of our society. The idea of the Founding Fathers was, if society is completely disarmed, the government has limitless power.
[b]Even though this incident is less traumatic, it never the less illustrates, there is a problem with people in general.
Which is why guns should be banned.[/b]
This country was founded upon the principle of limited government with minimal intrusion into the private lives of its citizens--citizens who have the right to arm themselves for protection.
If my arm were twisted, I suppose I might at least openly discuss the idea of limitations placed on semi-automatic, military-grade rifles and/or extended magazines. These killing sprees would be severely limited, if not wiped out altogether, if these disturbed, evil bastards didn't have 50-round clips and the ability to fire off multiple rounds per second. As an extreme case, imagine a crazy 20 year old ass-wipe, carrying a bolt-action rifle to the mall. He might squeeze off 2 or 3 shots before someone would tackle him and stomp his face into the floor.
But if you are serious about banning all guns, then you are either not an American, or you should never BE an American. Nothing more anti-American could be said than, "Guns should be banned."
Originally posted by sumydidI understand the role of guns in your constitution but we live in the 21st century now, it ain't the 1700's anymore. In the 1780's an armed peasant revolt may very well have had a chance of over throwing a government but here and now in the 21st century that ain't going to happen. I don't care how many guns the revolt has it wouldn't stand a chance against the might of the US military.
The USA will never, ever ban guns (without facing a revolt). The right to bear arms is completely fundamental to the structure of our society. The idea of the Founding Fathers was, if society is completely disarmed, the government has limitless power.
This country was founded upon the principle of limited government with minimal intrusion into the priva ...[text shortened]... ever BE an American. Nothing more anti-American could be said than, "Guns should be banned."
Originally posted by sumydidConcepts in this post:
The USA will never, ever ban guns (without facing a revolt). The right to bear arms is completely fundamental to the structure of our society. The idea of the Founding Fathers was, if society is completely disarmed, the government has limitless power.
This country was founded upon the principle of limited government with minimal intrusion into the priva ...[text shortened]... ever BE an American. Nothing more anti-American could be said than, "Guns should be banned."
it is a [human] right to bear firearms in case the government intervenes in their lives
guns are the only thing keeping the government at bay
a murdering manic with a bolt action rifle would be tackled to the floor by a member of the public after only shooting a few people
If you think guns should be banned I will take away your citizenship
Please tell us you are being in some way ironic...?
Originally posted by ChessPraxisI agree that there is a problem with people in general - but, and you might call me cynical here, there has always been such a problem and so long as there are people there always will be. As such, given that the key problem isn't going to go away any time soon (unless it can be shown otherwise) we need to address the secondary problem of how we limit the carnage that can be wreaked by the first problem (people).
Thanks and sorry for being a smart ass, well this time anyway.
Even though this incident is less traumatic, it never the less illustrates, there is a problem with people in general.
Originally posted by sumydidThe right to bear arms is completely fundamental to the structure of our society.
The USA will never, ever ban guns (without facing a revolt). The right to bear arms is completely fundamental to the structure of our society. The idea of the Founding Fathers was, if society is completely disarmed, the government has limitless power.
This country was founded upon the principle of limited government with minimal intrusion into the priva ever BE an American. Nothing more anti-American could be said than, "Guns should be banned."
And here I thought it the Constitition - which provides a mechanism for amendment and that includes the Second Amendment. Claiming it to be "fundamental" doesn't seem to hold water.
But if you are serious about banning all guns, then you are either not an American, or you should never BE an American. Nothing more anti-American could be said than, "Guns should be banned."
Seriously? Just how did you arrive at that conclusion?
The USA will never, ever ban guns (without facing a revolt).
So far as I know, the Constitution does not provide for the right to revolt should one not agree with a given amendment. Would not such a revolt then be "anti-American"?
If my arm were twisted, I suppose I might at least openly discuss the idea of limitations placed on semi-automatic, military-grade rifles and/or extended magazines. These killing sprees would be severely limited, if not wiped out altogether, if these disturbed, evil bastards didn't have 50-round clips and the ability to fire off multiple rounds per second. As an extreme case, imagine a crazy 20 year old ass-wipe, carrying a bolt-action rifle to the mall. He might squeeze off 2 or 3 shots before someone would tackle him and stomp his face into the floor.
Yes, those killing sprees would be severely limited. That said, curious that you would have to have your "arm twisted" in order for you to engage in an open discussion of the idea of limitations given that you recognize that. How many more need to be killed in that manner before you would advocate for imposing such limitations?
Originally posted by sumydidWe had an assaults weapons ban no problem, and there was no revolt. By the way, that ban will likely be reinstated if enough constituency pressure is put on the Republican religious fundamentalists and tea partiers in the House. or if the Dems can get control of the House in 2014.
The USA will never, ever ban guns (without facing a revolt).
NRA -- 26
School children -- 0
“The NRA hates freedom." “They don’t want you to have the freedom to send your children to school & expect them to come home alive.”
http://washingtonexaminer.com/michael-moore-the-nra-hates-freedom/article/2516007#.UMzF6m_Xbwg