Originally posted by shavixmirWake up shavix, the "Wall Has Fallen A Long Time Ago" ..... you must have missed it.
This is the interesting part of your statement.
With these two extremes facing off against each other, do you believe this creates friction?
If so, would you agree that friction leads to progression (progression meant as moving from situation A to situation B and not neccesairly for the better)?
If so, that's dialectic materialism for you. And that is what will lead society from capitalism to socialism/communism.
Originally posted by Bosse de NageSilly question.
No wonder people call you a parrot.
You answer first.
EDIT: the marauder, Nemesio and frogstomp are anti Roman Catholic. So are you.
EDIT2: .... and there are much more ..... Rwingo, Kirk .... oh well ... I forget their names too easily I guess.
EDIT3: Dr. Scribbles, RBHILL ....
Originally posted by ivanhoeTaking issue with certain sordid chapters in the RCC's history does not make me anti Roman Catholic in general. Why, some of my best friends are Catholic...So, without resorting to pointing fingers and naming names, what makes a person anti Roman Catholic?
Silly question. EDIT: the marauder, Nemesio and frogstomp are anti Roman Catholics. So are you.
Originally posted by Bosse de NageOh please ........... ask Shavixmir or the one who brought up the issue in this thread.
Taking issue with certain sordid chapters in the RCC's history does not make me anti Roman Catholic in general. Why, some of my best friends are Catholic...So, without resorting to pointing fingers and naming names, what makes a person anti Roman Catholic?
Originally posted by ivanhoePost a link then, o pious one. I'm sure many of those with which you've had discourse on THIS site would be happy to see your "criticisms" of the RCC. What's the difference where they're posted? Posted is posted, yes?
What makes you think I would post my criticism on this site ?