14 Feb 13
2 edits
'it cultivates wrong thinking do you see that phrase? where is wrong thinking cultivated? that's correct, in the mind and that leads to what according to the article wrong desire which leads to what? wrong action, fornication and/or homosexuality
now its not my fault your powers or reading comprehension seem to be minimal and that you could not discern this self evident detail, perhaps reading the beano and the dandy has left some kind of deficiency that needs to be addressed, who can say?
No we wont get there as long as your reading comprehension remains so thoroughly poor, one needs to interpret almost every piece of data simply so you an grasp its implications. Learn to read and understand what it is you are reading, who knows, you may do better? You could hardy do any worse.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
14 Feb 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieive over stepped the mark, i apologize. too much too soon. i guess you dont need accuracy and a balanced view when spending time pontificating to the converted.
thanks the matter is perfectly clear in my mind, i dont want nor need your help. Condescension is never becoming.
ooh 'paranoid android' has just come on the radio, how fitting.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
14 Feb 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieis this for me?
'[b]it cultivates wrong thinking do you see that phrase? where is wrong thinking cultivated? that's correct, in the mind and that leads to what according to the article wrong desire which leads to what? wrong action, fornication and/or homosexuality
now its not my fault your powers or reading comprehension seem to be minimal a ...[text shortened]... stand what it is you are reading, who knows, you may do better? You could hardy do any worse.[/b]
like i said robbie, im not here to argue and you have stated you dont need my help so ill leave you be. if you want some help explaining the errors in your last post give me a shout id be more than happy to contribute to your educational needs.
14 Feb 13
Originally posted by stellspalfiewe have helped thousands of persons to read, perhaps you can be one of them, its free.
is this for me?
like i said robbie, im not here to argue and you have stated you dont need my help so ill leave you be. if you want some help explaining the errors in your last post give me a shout id be more than happy to contribute to your educational needs.
14 Feb 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat percentage of homosexuals do you think can become heterosexuals through therapy? Less than 1%? Between 1% and 2%? Between 2% and 5%? More than that? What would be your estimate?
[the] unproven assumption that sexuality is immutable
14 Feb 13
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWould you accept that the sexuality of those homosexuals who are unable to change themselves into heterosexuals, as much as they might seek to, and even with therapy, is "immutable"?
[the] unproven assumption that sexuality is immutable
14 Feb 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo let me see if I understand what you wrote here correctly.
If one is inclined towards persons of the same sex and who fantasise about persons of the same sex which i assume they must do when masturbating, yes, i think its possible. The article makes it clear that if a persons engages in sexual fantasises they may seek out other persons, i dare say that it has happened and may lead to a homosexual act.
So, by the same token, are you also saying that masturbation can also lead to heterosexuality?
14 Feb 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAs far as I know, a preference for broccoli over brussel sprouts isn't encoded in our DNA either.
Its not news to me, you asked the question, you got the answer. I dont believe the once a homosexual always a homosexual, its nonsense. There is NO genetic evidence that predisposes one towards a particular sexuality, if there was, the the human gnome project would have identified a cause and here is news for you, they didn't find the so called gay ...[text shortened]... ality in such ludicrous terms, you got that? Good then perhaps you will come to terms with it.
Originally posted by Suziannewell well well, is anyone other than Robbie prepared to defend the scriptural record, or must he stand alone, the all conquering hero of Biblical truth among a daemon infested forum of materialist, secular liberals and wishy washy luke warm Christians intent on his demise!
As far as I know, a preference for broccoli over brussel sprouts isn't encoded in our DNA either.
14 Feb 13
2 edits
Originally posted by Suziannenope, i have explained the article, you may make reference to that, here it is again, sigh,
So let me see if I understand what you wrote here correctly.
So, by the same token, are you also saying that masturbation can also lead to heterosexuality?
'it cultivates wrong thinking', do you see that phrase? where is wrong thinking cultivated? that's correct, in the mind and that leads to what according to the article wrong desire which leads to what? wrong action, fornication and/or homosexuality
14 Feb 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobierobbie, my point is that, if this is true, then there must be "no single empirically established and conclusive genetic causation for" heterosexual behavior, either. N'est-ce pas?
I have already stated that there is no single empirically established and conclusive genetic causation for homosexual behaviour, how many time do you want me to repeat it. Why you cannot accept it is your affair, i am done arguing about it.
14 Feb 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobiebut I am not making reference to any article.
nope, i have explained the article, you may make reference to that, here it is again, sigh,
'it cultivates wrong thinking', do you see that phrase? where is wrong thinking cultivated? that's correct, in the mind and that leads to what according to the article wrong desire which leads to what? wrong action, fornication and/or homosexuality
You were asked a question, and you answered. That is what I am referencing.
14 Feb 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI would think a modern Christian, especially one who confronts the "unwashed masses" every day would have developed a thicker skin by now. 🙂
well well well, is anyone other than Robbie prepared to defend the scriptural record, or must he stand alone, the all conquering hero of Biblical truth among a daemon infested forum of materialist, secular liberals and wishy washy luke warm Christians intent on his demise!
14 Feb 13
Originally posted by Suziannewhy are you equating an anomaly (homosexuality) with a normality (heterosexuality), clearly genetically we are designed to pass on the genetic blueprint to the next generation, this we are told is the purpose of procreation, homosexuality therefore makes no sense, so your analogy is essentially flawed, you are attempting to equate an anomaly with a normality, epic fail, unless of course you are willing to argue that genetically the blueprint is not to reproduce itself in the next generation.
robbie, my point is that, if this is true, then there must be "no single empirically established and conclusive genetic causation for" heterosexual behavior, either. N'est-ce pas?