Originally posted by OmnislashBut, but, but, if the LORD is omnipotent (interesting word that - but we could discuss that elsewhere) then surely s/he would have forseen the beating of the meat and the twiddling of the button?
Well, I have heard it argued that it is not the function the Lord intended and as such is sinful on that grounds.
But then perhaps the LORD is impotent and not omnipotent!😛
Originally posted by MaustrauserThats a new one for me "twiddling of the button" - hee hee
But, but, but, if the LORD is omnipotent (interesting word that - but we could discuss that elsewhere) then surely s/he would have forseen the beating of the meat and the twiddling of the button?
But then perhaps the LORD is impotent and not omnipotent!😛
Originally posted by Alcra
Thats a new one for me "twiddling of the button" - hee hee
Interestingly, the word 'button' does not appear in the Bible. This is further clear evidence that the early Christian Church was keen to remove women from biblical history. Why was there no prohibition against female masturbation? Or is that OK and only male masturbation is a sin?
Originally posted by darvlayOf course its not freaking sin.
Is masturbation a sin? Is it unnatural like homosexuality? Are impure thoughts of lust, oral sex, heaving bosoms, long legs and a tight ass unnatural? Why would God create Man to be naturally unnatural?
Surely lust can only be "considered" aultery if you are thinking about a person already spoken for?? Therefore, as long as you are spanking John Thomas while thinking about a single girl/guy, you are OK. Here I come heaven!!!
Anyway, why would God/Jesus/Holy Spirit/Mary Magdelene give a toss (ha!)? It makes no sense.
Originally posted by PullhardBecause (apparently - and you may need to check this with Blindfaith or Darfius) whilst you are lusting over Jane or Jake and warming your hand, you are not thinking about God/Jesus/Holy Spirit etc.
Anyway, why would God/Jesus/Holy Spirit/Mary Magdelene give a toss (ha!)? It makes no sense.[/b]