Go back
Mathew 6:34

Mathew 6:34

Spirituality

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
10 Feb 20

@secondson said
why did the Roman government cut his head off?
A psy-ops operative being terminated at some point by his handlers after a mission has been accomplished is a dog bites man storyline.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
10 Feb 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@secondson said
Yours is merely the skewed perspective of an unbeliever, and an unaccredited one at that. And it won't matter how many sources you cite to bear witness to your assertions, the record in the Bible stands un-refuted by anything other than skepticism.
In other words, we believe different things. It's ok.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
10 Feb 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@secondson said
My question did not state, claim or imply that FMF said that Jesus was working for the Romans.
Your question, verbatim, was: You think Jesus was working for the Romans?

happy chappy

On my arse

Joined
08 Jan 17
Moves
62515
Clock
12 Feb 20

@FMF
Jesus did away with the law as under it all are unworthy. The law says I can't smoke dope,come back and do more good works please Lord.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
12 Feb 20

@happy-chappy said
@FMF
Jesus did away with the law as under it all are unworthy. The law says I can't smoke dope,come back and do more good works please Lord.
Smoke dope?

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
12 Feb 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
In other words, we believe different things. It's ok.
Yes Mr. Obvious.

I believe Jesus rose from the dead. You don't. One of us is wrong.

While it might be "ok" for me according to your beliefs, if you're right, but it won't be ok for you if I'm right.

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
12 Feb 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
Your question, verbatim, was: You think Jesus was working for the Romans?
Thanks for reminding me. You're kind of a forum hack that way.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
12 Feb 20

@secondson said
Thanks for reminding me. You're kind of a forum hack that way.
You said: "My question did not state, claim or imply that FMF said that Jesus was working for the Romans." But your question was, in fact: "You think Jesus was working for the Romans?"

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
13 Feb 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
You said: "My question did not state, claim or imply that FMF said that Jesus was working for the Romans." But your question was, in fact: "You think Jesus was working for the Romans?"
It was a question. Hack on.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
13 Feb 20

@secondson said
It was a question. Hack on.
I think Paul was likely to have been working for the Romans. If you have come across any commentators or scholars who believe Jesus was working for the Romans, I'd be curious to see what they have to say. Is that where you got the idea of 'Jesus working for the Romans' from?

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120562
Clock
13 Feb 20

@secondson said
If you didn't get it the first time, you probably never will. I'm not doing your thinking for you.
But I'll give you a clue. My question did not state, claim or imply that FMF said that Jesus was working for the Romans.
Besides having intellectually crippling biases and prejudices your comprehension of what is said is severely limited.
Bluster and blowhardiness is not a quality response secondson.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.