Originally posted by sonhouseI was baptised in a Southern Baptist church where I am still a member. I am still a protestant and closer to that belief than any other of the denominational churches. However, I have grown in my understanding and cannot claim that all my beliefs line up with any protestant denominational church.
At one point you said to me you were Baptist. Is that now not true? You are adding apostasy to your other crimes now?
Originally posted by RJHindsSo you are going Muslim?
I was baptised in a Southern Baptist church where I am still a member. I am still a protestant and closer to that belief than any other of the denominational churches. However, I have grown in my understanding and cannot claim that all my beliefs line up with any protestant denominational church.
Originally posted by twhiteheadAlright, I'll settle for even half that task from you.
If he knows the minor error in every denomination, then I don't see a problem with him listing them. He could do ten a day if more than that is too much for him.
If on the other hand, he does not know the actual error that each denomination has, but hold the belief for other reasons, then he can simply say so.
The argument that listing them would be too ...[text shortened]... one gets the impression he actually thinks that way rather than merely being hateful as you are.
Show me a list of every single Christian denomination.
I bet you can't even do that. Odds are you'll miss a few of the more unknown ones. Even Christians don't know every single denomination.
But my point was that no, he doesn't know each error in each denomination. He said he "believes", not he "knows". I think even he would tell you there was some hyperbole involved. Maybe not, though.
My secondary point is that this isn't a bonifide "challenge" in a "debate". It's a bunch of trolls on an internet forum jumping with both feet onto a guy they see as "easy prey".
Originally posted by RJHindsstrange we have lynched no one after a service on Sunday, not blown anyone up with bombs, not nuked anyone, not massacred defenceless women and children, not engaged in genocide, no political assassinations. No i don't think we have committed any atrocities comparable to baptists, presbyterians or methodists.
And so has Jehovah Witnesses. 😏
30 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou rail on an on and on about other people's morality, and yet you cannot even say whether or not you would allow your own child to die rather than permit them to have a blood transfusion.
strange we have lynched no one after a service on Sunday, not blown anyone up with bombs, not nuked anyone, not massacred defenceless women and children, not engaged in genocide, no political assassinations. No i don't think we have committed any atrocities comparable to baptists, presbyterians or methodists.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI don't know if any Jehovah's Witnesses were involved in those type of atrocities or not, but Jehovah's Witnesses are known for allowing their children to die by refusing blood transfusions for them which i think is an atrocity.
strange we have lynched no one after a service on Sunday, not blown anyone up with bombs, not nuked anyone, not massacred defenceless women and children, not engaged in genocide, no political assassinations. No i don't think we have committed any atrocities comparable to baptists, presbyterians or methodists.
30 Apr 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobiehttps://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=zhzdnWVqSC48.k_qIZIE0xxPI
strange we have lynched no one after a service on Sunday, not blown anyone up with bombs, not nuked anyone, not massacred defenceless women and children, not engaged in genocide, no political assassinations. No i don't think we have committed any atrocities comparable to baptists, presbyterians or methodists.
😲