Originally posted by rwingettWhile I can't agree entirely with what has been posted to date on the thread, mocking God should not be undertaken with hopes of impunity. If I could liken it to anything in the physical world, it is something akin to leaving highly insulting remarks on a public forum with no thought to the consequences of a face-to-face meeting with the more powerful insultee.
Your post is one of the greatest piles of garbage ever typed out by the hand of man. It's an extreme case of biased data selection if ever there was one. You've taken a mere eight samples that seem to agree with your conclusion and have used them in an attempt to demonstrate that people who mock god come to an unpleasant and untimely end. Absolute rubbish. ...[text shortened]... e, random chance in action. And finally that you, Nicksten, are a complete and total idiot.
The insulter's hope is to avoid such contact, and only makes his remarks in light of that hope, ill-placed or otherwise (who knows? they may unknowingly live next door to one another). In the same way, George, Richard, Bert, et al, mock during their opening arguments. The closing arguments by the One they mock (and subsequent judgment and/or valuation) is where the pudding produces its proof. It is at that point that the axiom profoundly is shown at last.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHMocking Nicksten is an action I may be held accountable for. Mocking god I may do with impunity.
While I can't agree entirely with what has been posted to date on the thread, mocking God should not be undertaken with hopes of impunity. If I could liken it to anything in the physical world, it is something akin to leaving highly insulting remarks on a public forum with no thought to the consequences of a face-to-face meeting with the more powerful ins ...[text shortened]... e pudding produces its proof. It is at that point that the axiom profoundly is shown at last.
Originally posted by rwingettApparently, for folks like yourself, there is but one way your theory may be tested. I forget: did you say you were a believer in the Lord Jesus Christ at one point, or was that someone else?
Mocking Nicksten is an action I may be held accountable for. Mocking god I may do with impunity.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHThat was someone else.
Apparently, for folks like yourself, there is but one way your theory may be tested. I forget: did you say you were a believer in the Lord Jesus Christ at one point, or was that someone else?
I suppose my theory may be tested in the end. But I rather suspect that it will not. I'll take my chances, as will you.
Originally posted by NickstenGod cannot reveal himself by rearranging the stars that are visible from the Northern Hemisphere to spell, "Jesus Christ is Lord of the Heavens and the Earth."
Yip, for one reason only (and this is my personal opinion)
Cause they said God cannot, and God proved them wrong.
Were the people really just giving a comment or were they inviting disaster? Out of so many things to say, why would someone give a "comment" like "Not even God can take it away from me now" when it infact is mock towards God. The funny thing is, these people dont even believe in Him, and still yet say this stuff.
Prove me wrong, God. I'll be watching. 🙄
Originally posted by NickstenI know what you wrote; I just don't believe you.
🙂 I dont know where you are going with this.
I honestly dont know how those people died. If it is true or false, so it will be then.
I clearly wrote: (line1) "Some of you have had to had read this e-mail before, if not, here it is..."
(Line2) "What do you think about this?"
The title of the the thread reads "Never mock god!" and with the conte ...[text shortened]... at do you think about this?" ... meaning, what do think about the content of the e-mail?
If one lived in a Christian environment and were to mock God, then they would die from the environment. I guess that is logical.
At the same time if Christians were to impose themselves in excess onto non-Christians, then the results would likely be the non-Christians mocking God. In effect, the Christians could create people to mock God, because of a false need to impose.