02 Dec 12
Originally posted by galveston75On the other thread you made it quite clear: other Christians have to agree with you about the League of Nations being "described" in Revelation 13:11-15 otherwise they are "wrong". How about this thing about "[Adam's] problem is he loved Eve more then God"? Is it the same? If Christians disagree with you, are they "wrong" like with the League of Nations thing?
*************************
02 Dec 12
Originally posted by FMF*******************
On the other thread you made it quite clear: other Christians have to agree with you about the League of Nations being "described" in Revelation 13:11-15 otherwise they are "wrong". How about this thing about "[Adam's] problem is he loved Eve more then God"? Is it the same? If Christians disagree with you, are they "wrong" like with the League of Nations thing?
02 Dec 12
1 edit
Originally posted by galveston75You still seem to be dodging my question. Is your 'League of Nations interpretation' on the same level as your 'Adam & Eve interpretation' in so far as to disagree with you [according to what you have claimed on this forum recently] is the same as 'not having listened to God'? It's a point blank question, galveston75, on topic, and a direct response to a claim you appear to have made in several posts addressed to me directly.
********************
02 Dec 12
Originally posted by FMF**************
You still seem to be dodging my question. Is your 'League of Nations interpretation' on the same level as your 'Adam & Eve interpretation' in so far as to disagree with you [according to what you have claimed on this forum recently] is the same as 'not having listened to God'? It's a point blank question, galveston75, on topic, and a direct response to a claim you appear to have made in several posts addressed to me directly.
02 Dec 12
Originally posted by rwingettwe are perfectly capable of building with horse manure. that doesn't mean we call that good construction practice.
We are perfectly capable of building societies without equality. There have been plenty of them throughout history that functioned perfectly well. They may not be the kind of society we aspire to in the 21st century, but there is no inherent reason why unequal societies cannot function.
- Joined
- 30 Dec 04
- Moves
- 97453
02 Dec 12
Originally posted by galveston75No, he used to start it once a week but hasn't in awhile. Back in 92' it wouldn't pass inspection because part of the frame in the back had rotted through. The original owner had left it parked on the grass for a few years. Someday though...
That's great. Hopefully it will all work out in time and you can get that baby restored soon. Does it run at all right now?
02 Dec 12
Originally posted by galveston75It would appear you have backed yourself into a corner of your own making. If there are any claims about the authority or status of your own personal
**************
interpretations of passages from the bible that you'd like to withdraw or distance yourself from or explain, perhaps you should do just do so.
02 Dec 12
Originally posted by FMF**************
It would appear you have backed yourself into a corner of your own making. If there are any claims about the authority or status of your own personal
interpretations of passages from the bible that you'd like to withdraw or distance yourself from or explain, perhaps you should do just do so.
02 Dec 12
Originally posted by boononDo you know what engine is in it?
No, he used to start it once a week but hasn't in awhile. Back in 92' it wouldn't pass inspection because part of the frame in the back had rotted through. The original owner had left it parked on the grass for a few years. Someday though...
02 Dec 12
1 edit
Originally posted by galveston75You're just dodging my question, galveston75. You have made specific claims about the Bible. I have pointed out inconsistencies. But you seem to be acting in a resentful way. Not only that, it also seems that you want everyone to know that you feel resentful.
**************
02 Dec 12
Originally posted by galveston75This is the wisest course of action, he manages to turn every single thread into a
**************
personal attack and has to my knowledge never offered anything of spiritual
significance? One must ask the question why is that? It appears that the entire
summation of his spirituality is to humiliate other users although what satisfaction he
derives form this can be only known to himself. The Bible counsels Christians to avoid
the contentious and its the course of wisdom to do so. I have stopped corresponding
with him entirely and have been having a great time since, its like a kind of relief.
People always remember the way we make them feel.