09 Feb 15
2 edits
Originally posted by Shallow BlueIt is the astrologer that you should be attacking for taking advantage of Nancy Reagans emotions just after her husband was almost assassinated. Nancy said later that she only used the advice from the astrologer as one means of coping after the attack on her husband that the secret Service failed to prevent in the hopes that they could avoid another attempt, but Ronald resisted the constant attempts to control his schedule. The astrologer later wrote a book to make more money when she was no longer able to get money from Nancy Reagan.
Well, yeah. When he entered the White House he was already too demented to believe in anything which wasn't spoon-fed to him by his CIA advisors.
That is the same thing that low life Peter Popoff was doing with those that believed that Christ might heal them through the laying on of hands by who they were led to believe was anointed by God to heal through faith.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
09 Feb 15
Originally posted by RJHindsOn this, I will wholeheartedly agree with you.
It is the astrologer that you should be attacking for taking advantage of Nancy Reagans emotions just after her husband was almost assassinated. Nancy said later that she only used the advice from the astrologer as one means of coping after the attack on her husband that the secret Service failed to prevent in the hopes that they could avoid another attempt, ...[text shortened]... he laying on of hands by who they were led to believe was anointed by God to heal through faith.
Our anger, and approbation, should be directed at those who take advantage of the
vulnerable and gullible.
They are leeches on society.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
10 Feb 15
5 edits
Originally posted by RJHindsI don't like to speak in a way to expose the leader of people. But for the quacks who want to say Obama is the Antchrist why not expose their double standard.
However, it is clear the Presiden Reagan never believed in such nonsense.
So Ronald was not involved. Well let's see what WAS Reagan's philosophy of life. He told us himself.
He said that his philosophy of life was compared to the two hunters running from a charging bear. One puts on his sneakers. The other says "You cannot out run the bear with the sneakers." And the first says tellingly "I don't need to outrun the bear. I just need to outrun YOU."
That's a fine life philosophy. It sounds like Cain in Genesis 4 - "Am I my brother's keeper?"
You should be right proud of such pragmatism RJ. "Let the bear get the slow guy just as long as I save my skin, Who cares? "
Fine pragmatic conservatism at its very best no doubt. Outrun the slow guy and let the disaster overtake him. Why be some bleeding heart sentimentalist liberal? Let the other guy die for not keeping up.
Look, you want to get into throwing eggs back and forth at presidents, there're plenty to go around.
Like Jesse Jackson said - I prefer Franklin Roosevelt in a wheel chair to Ronald Reagan on a horse.
10 Feb 15
Originally posted by sonshipYou don't seem to understand when someone is telling a joke. No wonder you have trouble understanding people.
I don't like to speak in a way to expose the leader of people. But for the quacks who want to say Obama is the Antchrist why not expose their double standard.
So Ronald was not involved. Well let's see what WAS Reagan's philosophy of life. He told us himself.
He said that his philosophy of life was compared to the two hunters running from a charging ...[text shortened]... e Jesse Jackson said - I prefer Franklin Roosevelt in a wheel chair to Ronald Reagan on a horse.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
10 Feb 15
Originally posted by RJHindsFeh. Astrologers are beneath attack. Besides, he did not set policies that had a severe negative impact on world peace and the global economy - Reagan himself did that, or at least his staff did, on the instigation of the secret services and with the aid of his UKian counterpart Mystic Maggie.
It is the astrologer that you should be attacking for taking advantage of Nancy Reagans emotions just after her husband was almost assassinated. Nancy said later that she only used the advice from the astrologer as one means of coping after the attack on her husband that the secret Service failed to prevent in the hopes that they could avoid another attempt, ...[text shortened]... he laying on of hands by who they were led to believe was anointed by God to heal through faith.
(Which is not to say that I don't agree with your assessment of astrologers and Popoff - in fact, I'd extend that to all faith healers, dirty Simonists the lot of them - but I don't think they're an important part of why the Reagan regime was so harmful. Reagan himself, his mental deterioration, and his staff were.)
Originally posted by Shallow BlueI believe the Reagan presidency was one of the most beneficial in history. Don't you consider the disruption of Soviet communism and the fall of the Berlin wall to free those people a benefit? And how about being able to keep more of your hard earned money instead of having the government take it to support those that will not work? How about the build up of the Military for our national defense? However, it was the Republican President Nixon that requested the elimination of the draft and the creation of the all volunteer military.
Feh. Astrologers are beneath attack. Besides, he did not set policies that had a severe negative impact on world peace and the global economy - Reagan himself did that, or at least his staff did, on the instigation of the secret services and with the aid of his UKian counterpart Mystic Maggie.
(Which is not to say that I don't agree with your ...[text shortened]... the Reagan regime was so harmful. Reagan himself, his mental deterioration, and his staff were.)
10 Feb 15
Originally posted by RJHindsRepublicans are quick to take credit for the fall of the Soviet empire but it was failure within the system that brought it down and all Reagan did was fan the flames. It would have fallen with just a hard a thump if a Democrat was president.
I believe the Reagan presidency was one of the most beneficial in history. Don't you consider the disruption of Soviet communism and the fall of the Berlin wall to free those people a benefit? And how about being able to keep more of your hard earned money instead of having the government take it to support those that will not work?
You believe the American propaganda. Remember, the winners get to write the script.
10 Feb 15
2 edits
Originally posted by sonhouseWhat so-called great things, other that Obamacare, do you believe the Democrats are going to take credit for at the end of Obama's presidency in order to elect another Democrat? Will closing Gitmo by releasing all the terrorists be one of them? Maybe they will claim the world became more peaceful because Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize and I do mean "given" for he did not earn it.
Republicans are quick to take credit for the fall of the Soviet empire but it was failure within the system that brought it down and all Reagan did was fan the flames. It would have fallen with just a hard a thump if a Democrat was president.
You believe the American propaganda. Remember, the winners get to write the script.
10 Feb 15
Originally posted by RJHindsLike I have said before, you republicans are a hypocritical bunch. If Obama had happened to have been Republican, NONE of these so-called arguments would have EVER come up. To Rush Limberger, he would have been up their with Jesus Christ.
What so-called great things, other that Obamacare, do you believe the Democrats are going to take credit for at the end of Obama's presidency in order to elect another Democrat? Will closing Gitmo by releasing all the terrorists be one of them? Maybe they will claim the world became more peaceful because Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize and I do mean "given" for he did not earn it.
Its kind of funny that the thread went from Obama being the anichrist to a go around between democrats and republicans. Me personally, i think the only difference between republicans and democrats is the color of the tie that one wears... and that aint saying much. They are all self serving one way or another, better not to put much faith with either party IMO.
10 Feb 15
Originally posted by yoctobyteGenerally, the Republican party is the party of old, white, money. That is the biggest difference. Republicans don't want to help ANYONE but themselves and big business.
Its kind of funny that the thread went from Obama being the anichrist to a go around between democrats and republicans. Me personally, i think the only difference between republicans and democrats is the color of the tie that one wears... and that aint saying much. They are all self serving one way or another, better not to put much faith with either party IMO.
10 Feb 15
Originally posted by sonhouseIf he had been Republican, he would not have been eleted President. Over 90% of Blacks vote Democratic, they would not vote for a Black Republican President.
Like I have said before, you republicans are a hypocritical bunch. If Obama had happened to have been Republican, NONE of these so-called arguments would have EVER come up. To Rush Limberger, he would have been up their with Jesus Christ.
10 Feb 15
Originally posted by sonhouseWill Obama stopping the Keystone pipeline by a veto be considered a great accomplishment for the Democrats?
Generally, the Republican party is the party of old, white, money. That is the biggest difference. Republicans don't want to help ANYONE but themselves and big business.