Spirituality
24 Aug 06
24 Aug 06
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesCase in point. A biomedical company has found a way to harvest stem cells without harming the embryos. Even the Bush administration is very positive about this deveolpment. But the Vatican? Yep, you guessed it.
You'd think they would have learned their lesson after that shameful incident. It sounds like history is repeating itself.
24 Aug 06
Originally posted by LutherMaherYou weren't here the last time we had the Galileo discussion but let me tell whoo boy it got heated.
Your just recycling simplistic interpretations of complex historical events. Do you know anything beyond the one sentence referecnes to the Galileo incident in todays current events? Wait dont tell me....NO!
25 Aug 06
Originally posted by LutherMaherDo you demand that we know the history of theology or can we just be good at theology (i.e., making crap up)?
if there is someone here with even a mediocre amount of knowledge in the fields of history and theology, I would invite you to discuss the Galileo story with me at my MSN Group
25 Aug 06
Originally posted by kirksey957I think the Vatican was at its happiest when there were indulgences and no Muslims. Why do you think they pray so much? PLEASE LORD, give me back that wonderful time.......
Case in point. A biomedical company has found a way to harvest stem cells without harming the embryos. Even the Bush administration is very positive about this deveolpment. But the Vatican? Yep, you guessed it.
25 Aug 06
1 edit
Though rare (at least in the spirituality forum), intelligent minds do exist here. We have exchanged a few words about Galileo, and one side of the debate (if you can call it that) are simply recycling one sentence simplistic generalizations that they read in current events. An article that trancends this type of discussion (not exactly a difficult feat) concerning the Galileo affair, may be read here.
http://groups.msn.com/SparrowCenter/science.msnw?action=get_message&mview=1&ID_Message=4
You may have to be a member to read it, I am not sure.
25 Aug 06
1 edit
Originally posted by LutherMaherYou don't get it do you? We are not going to visit your stupid site that requires a login to view a stupid article that we don't care about because we've actually gone over the same damn material more times than we care to remember.
Though rare (at least in the spirituality forum), intelligent minds do exist here. We have exchanged a few words about Galileo, and one side of the debate (if you can call it that) are simply recycling one sentence simplistic generalizations that they read in current events. An article that trancends this type of discussion (not exactly a difficult fea ...[text shortened]... ?action=get_message&mview=1&ID_Message=4
You may have to be a member to read it, I am not sure.
EDIT: Especially not when you try to insult us at the same time. Also nice posting history. I like how half your posts have a link to your amazing website and the rest of them are about it.