- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29597
16 Apr 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Not at all. You merely demonstrated your lack of integrity in deliberately misrepresenting what another poster had written. Even Becker recognized the term 'notion' was introduced by the thread creator and had used it himself. (Hence me using it in my reply to him).
You’re just upset I called you out on that “notion” business. You deserved to be called out on that and I was more than happy to do it.
If you were not predisposed to quickly searching for ammunition, you might have stopped to realize that.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
16 Apr 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeI didn’t misrepresent what you wrote; I quoted it directly and then questioned your very poorly-worded post. I realize you’re embarrassed, but really. Enough already, heartpence.
Not at all. You merely demonstrated your lack of integrity in deliberately misrepresenting what another poster had written. Even Becker recognized the term 'notion' was introduced by the thread creator and had used it himself. (Hence me using it in my reply to him).
If you were not predisposed to quickly searching for ammunition, you might have stopped to realize that.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29597
16 Apr 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Yes, I am invariably embarrassed communicating with you. As I say, you are void of integrity and a poor ambassador of your faith.
I didn’t misrepresent what you wrote; I quoted it directly and then questioned your very poorly-worded post. I realize you’re embarrassed, but really. Enough already, heartpence.
And you may wish to google the different between 'misquoting' and 'misrepresenting.'
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeYou misspelt bellend.
... you are void of integrity and a poor ambassador of your faith.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
16 Apr 18
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeIt’s sad you can’t acknowledge that you expressed yourself very poorly in that post.
Yes, I am invariably embarrassed communicating with you. As I say, you are void of integrity and a poor ambassador of your faith.
And you may wish to google the different between 'misquoting' and 'misrepresenting.'
And your opinion of me means even less to me than dive’s.
You’re a bad hombre!
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
16 Apr 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterHi tiger,
You misspelt bellend.
Did you want the crunchy or smooth PB today? We’re all out of white bread; is rye Ok? I’ll cut the crusts off the way you like it.
17 Apr 18
I would like to see absolute proof that Assad is behind all of that.
It literally makes no sense, the timeline they propose...
... So, ISIS is nearly defeated, we've just taken over Eastern Ghouta, and final victory is totally in sight...
... How about we create a massive international incident by gassing random civilians instead of simply pushing ahead with victory?
lol.
Sun Tzu's Art of War:
"When you're winning the war, always do something insanely controversial right before victory so as to draw in sympathies and enrage neighboring states."
17 Apr 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaIf you are referring to the genocide that you were unaware of, it has been going on for about seven years.
I would like to see absolute proof that Assad is behind all of that.
It literally makes no sense, the timeline they propose...
... So, ISIS is nearly defeated, we've just taken over Eastern Ghouta, and final victory is totally in sight...
... How about we create a massive international incident by gassing random civilians instead of simply push ...[text shortened]... y controversial right before victory so as to draw in sympathies and enrage neighboring states."
18 Apr 18
Originally posted by @fmfThe "genocide" of who?
If you are referring to the genocide that you were unaware of, it has been going on for about seven years.
Genocide implies that a specific group of people, esp. an ethnic group, has been targeted.
Otherwise, if it is just this general mass killing of political enemies, "democide" is a better word.
18 Apr 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Okay. So God is NOT in charge.
No, I don’t. Evil came into existence through rebellion against God by entities that had free will.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29597
18 Apr 18
Originally posted by @romans1009As an atheist, 'I have no notion of divine law' (I do not accept the existence of God and as a consequence do not recognise the existence of any divine law that governs the way I should live my life).
It’s sad you can’t acknowledge that you expressed yourself very poorly in that post.
Only a complete imbecile would decern, 'I have no notion of divine law' as me saying 'divine law, never heard of it.'
I expressed myself perfectly. You either understood it poorly or disingenuously. (I suspect the latter).
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @apathistHow do you come to that conclusion? God is definitely in control.
Okay. So God is NOT in charge.
“Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:”
(Isaiah 46:10)
“Be still, and know that I am God: I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth.”
(Psalm 46:10)
God allows us to make our own choices, and Satan has no more power than God permits him. Notice in the book of Job, Satan couldn’t do anything to Job without God’s approval.
On a side note it amazes me that Job isn’t included among the heroes of the faith in Hebrews chapter 11.
20 Apr 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaThis community is crawling with Christians who believe they will be judged on whether or not they have faith and most expressly they believe they will not be judged on how they used their free will. This seems different from what you are saying. Do they have a point?
And, in the end, we will be judged on how we used our free will.