10 Oct 05
Originally posted by sjegMost recently in the Why did God create DNA thread, in which the lack of fundamentalist response is conspicuous for its absence.
Not exactly: creation and evolution do not exclude on another at all logically. I hope you do actually see that, and that is has nothing to do with 'creationism'. But that topic has been done to death here, so I won't bore you all any further.
10 Oct 05
1 edit
Originally posted by dj2beckerCOSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
(1) If I say something does not have a cause, it has no cause.
(2) I say the universe has no cause.
(3) Therefore, the universe has no cause.
(4) Therefore, God does not exist.
(1) If I say something does not have a cause, it has no cause.
(2) I say that neither you nor this thread have a cause.
(3) Therefore, neither you nor this thread has any cause.
(4) Therefore, neither you nor this thread actually exist.
[b]
Sweet!
10 Oct 05
Originally posted by zombiesYou've certainly refuted any possible claim that you have a sense of humor. Well done! 🙄
COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
(1) If I say something does not have a cause, it has no cause.
[b]-on what authority does what you (a mere mortal) say become reality
(2) I say the universe has no cause.
(3) Therefore, the universe has no cause.
(4) Therefore, God does not exist.
ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
(1) I cannot conceive a perfect God.
-God conceive ...[text shortened]... oose differently death shall be your reward, and you go straight to the pit of hell. hahaaa[/b]
11 Feb 06
Originally posted by dj2beckerHa ha, this is too funny!
COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
(1) If I say something does not have a cause, it has no cause.
(2) I say the universe has no cause.
(3) Therefore, the universe has no cause.
(4) Therefore, God does not exist.
ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
(1) I cannot conceive a perfect God.
(2) One of the qualities of perfection is existence.
(3) Therefore, God does not exist.
...[text shortened]... God! I do not I do not I do not I DO NOT believe in God!
(2) Therefore, God does not exist.
How about another one?
(1) dj2becker exists.
(2) God wouldn't allow someone with such a poor grasp of logic to become one of His spokespeople.
(3) Therefore, god doesn't exist.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
12 Feb 06
2 edits
umm, actually, every single one of these arguments have a logical fallacy and/or or assume something they shouldn't and can't in order to make their point.
All those arguments are a joke. Don't worry: the last thing that I would believe is that God does not exist.😏
Edit: This is just to explain to all those that have have sent PMs to try to convince me that God exists!😞